These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3419826)

  • 1. Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. II. Accommodative microfluctuations.
    Wood JM; Bullimore MA; Wild JM; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 3419826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. I. Pupil size.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Bullimore MA; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 2971152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of 0.1% cyclopentolate or 10% phenylephrine on pupil diameter and accommodation.
    Mordi J; Tucker J; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 3748569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
    Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
    Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of modulating ocular depth of focus upon accommodation microfluctuations in myopic and emmetropic subjects.
    Day M; Seidel D; Gray LS; Strang NC
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 18992269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of thymoxamine, phenylephrine and cyclopentolate on the accommodative process in man.
    Zetterström C
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Dec; 65(6):699-704. PubMed ID: 2963479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus.
    Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-dependent normative values for differential luminance sensitivity in automated static perimetry using the Octopus 101.
    Hermann A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Krapp E; Rauscher S; Schiefer U
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 86(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 18070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human dynamic closed-loop accommodation augmented by sympathetic inhibition.
    Culhane HM; Winn B; Gilmartin B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1137-43. PubMed ID: 10235546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results.
    Kudrna GR; Stanley MA; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The effects on accommodative and pupillary responses by topical application of cyclopentolate hydrochloride].
    Ohmi G; Kinoshita H; Kinoshita S
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Nov; 95(11):1099-104. PubMed ID: 1759650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of accommodation and refractive status on the peripheral refractive profile.
    Davies LN; Mallen EA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 93(9):1186-90. PubMed ID: 19525242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus configuration and the format of the normal sensitivity gradient.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Wood JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Aug; 69(4):371-83. PubMed ID: 3060338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Variability of sensitivity thresholds in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the central vision field].
    Polo Llorens V; Larrosa Poves JM; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez L; Rojo Aragües A; Cuevas Andrés R; Ruiz Moreno O; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11151125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast sensitivity loss in the peripheral visual field following laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Montés-Micó R; Ferrer-Blasco T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jun; 33(6):1120-2. PubMed ID: 17531714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.