225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34198642)
1. Clinical Value of Virtual Reality versus 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease.
Lau I; Gupta A; Sun Z
Biomolecules; 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34198642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical Applications of Mixed Reality and 3D Printing in Congenital Heart Disease.
Lau I; Gupta A; Ihdayhid A; Sun Z
Biomolecules; 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36358899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast-track virtual reality for cardiac imaging in congenital heart disease.
Raimondi F; Vida V; Godard C; Bertelli F; Reffo E; Boddaert N; El Beheiry M; Masson JB
J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2598-2602. PubMed ID: 33760302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Virtual Reality Angiogram vs 3-Dimensional Printed Angiogram as an Educational tool-A Comparative Study.
Bairamian D; Liu S; Eftekhar B
Neurosurgery; 2019 Aug; 85(2):E343-E349. PubMed ID: 30715444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease: A systematic review.
Lau I; Sun Z
J Med Radiat Sci; 2018 Sep; 65(3):226-236. PubMed ID: 29453808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of virtual reality in congenital heart disease.
Ong CS; Krishnan A; Huang CY; Spevak P; Vricella L; Hibino N; Garcia JR; Gaur L
Congenit Heart Dis; 2018 May; 13(3):357-361. PubMed ID: 29399969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advanced Medical Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease: Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, Virtual Reality, and Three-Dimensional Printing.
Goo HW; Park SJ; Yoo SJ
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 31997589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "From Vision to Reality: Virtual Reality's Impact on Baffle Planning in Congenital Heart Disease".
Priya S; La Russa D; Walling A; Goetz S; Hartig T; Khayat A; Gupta P; Nagpal P; Ashwath R
Pediatr Cardiol; 2024 Jan; 45(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 37932525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DICOM 3D viewers, virtual reality or 3D printing - a pilot usability study for assessing the preference of orthopedic surgeons.
Popescu D; Marinescu R; Laptoiu D; Deac GC; Cotet CE
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Sep; 235(9):1014-1024. PubMed ID: 34176364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) vs 3D printed models of congenital heart disease in resident and nurse practitioner educational experience.
Awori J; Friedman SD; Howard C; Kronmal R; Buddhe S
3D Print Med; 2023 Feb; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36773171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Virtual Reality Medical Image Display System for Group Discussions of Congenital Heart Disease: Development and Usability Testing.
Kim B; Loke YH; Mass P; Irwin MR; Capeland C; Olivieri L; Krieger A
JMIR Cardio; 2020 Dec; 4(1):e20633. PubMed ID: 33289675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of 3D printed heart models in immediate and long-term knowledge acquisition in medical education.
Lau I; Sun Z
Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2022 Jan; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 35092214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimized preoperative planning of double outlet right ventricle patients by 3D printing and virtual reality: a pilot study.
Peek JJ; Bakhuis W; Sadeghi AH; Veen KM; Roest AAW; Bruining N; van Walsum T; Hazekamp MG; Bogers AJJC
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 37(2):. PubMed ID: 37202357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Three-dimensional visual assessment and virtual reality study of centrally located hepatocellular carcinoma on the axis of blood vessels].
Zhu W; He SS; Zeng SL; Zhang P; Yang J; Xiang N; Zeng N; Fan YF; Wen S; Fang CH; Zhang K
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 May; 57(5):358-365. PubMed ID: 31091591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical value of patient-specific three-dimensional printing of congenital heart disease: Quantitative and qualitative assessments.
Lau IWW; Liu D; Xu L; Fan Z; Sun Z
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194333. PubMed ID: 29561912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional Accuracy and Clinical Value of 3D Printed Models in Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lau IWW; Sun Z
J Clin Med; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31540421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-Dimensional Printing, Virtual Reality and Mixed Reality for Pulmonary Atresia: Early Surgical Outcomes Evaluation.
Cen J; Liufu R; Wen S; Qiu H; Liu X; Chen X; Yuan H; Huang M; Zhuang J
Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Feb; 30(2):296-302. PubMed ID: 32863113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stereoscopic virtual reality does not improve knowledge acquisition of congenital heart disease.
Patel N; Costa A; Sanders SP; Ezon D
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jul; 37(7):2283-2290. PubMed ID: 33677745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional virtual and printed models for planning adult cardiovascular surgery.
Borracci RA; Ferreira LM; Alvarez Gallesio JM; Tenorio Núñez OM; David M; Eyheremendy EP
Acta Cardiol; 2021 Jul; 76(5):534-543. PubMed ID: 33283655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
