162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34201426)
1. Vacuum Dynamics as an Alternative Method for Detection of Bimodal Milk Ejection in Dairy Cows.
Wieland M; Geary CM; Gioia G; Case KL; Moroni P; Sipka A
Animals (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34201426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2 types of milk flow meters for detecting bimodality in dairy cows.
Wieland M; Sipka A
J Dairy Sci; 2023 Feb; 106(2):1078-1088. PubMed ID: 36494231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between teat shape and bimodal milk ejection in Holstein dairy cows.
Wieland M; Spellman ME; Somula H; Singh A
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38490544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bimodal milk flow and overmilking in dairy cattle: risk factors and consequences.
Fernandes S; Pereira G; Bexiga R
Animal; 2023 Mar; 17(3):100716. PubMed ID: 36791490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Sensor-Based and Audible Detection of Milking Liner Slips during Machine Milking of Dairy Cows.
Wieland M; Spellman ME; Case KL; Geary CM; Sipka A
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Feb; 24(5):. PubMed ID: 38474897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dam-calf contact rearing in Switzerland: Aspects of management and milking.
Rell J; Nanchen C; Savary P; Buchli C; Rufener C
J Dairy Sci; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38762107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of flow-controlled vacuum on milking performance and teat condition in a rotary milking parlor.
Reinemann DJ; van den Borne BHP; Hogeveen H; Wiedemann M; Paulrud CO
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jun; 104(6):6820-6831. PubMed ID: 33773794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A method for assessing teatcup liner performance during the peak milk flow period.
Penry JF; Upton J; Leonardi S; Thompson PD; Reinemann DJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jan; 101(1):649-660. PubMed ID: 29102142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different vacuum levels, vacuum reduction during low milk flow, and different cluster detachment levels affect milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
Stauffer C; Feierabend M; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9250-9260. PubMed ID: 32747105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vacuum levels and milk-flow-dependent vacuum drops affect machine milking performance and teat condition in dairy cows.
Besier J; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):3096-3102. PubMed ID: 26830741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between dairy cows' hind leg activity and vacuum records during milking.
Meyer D; Haeussermann A; Hartung E
Animal; 2021 Apr; 15(4):100186. PubMed ID: 33637440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technical note: Reduced pulsation chamber vacuum at normal pulsation rate and ratio provides adequate prestimulation to induce oxytocin release and milk ejection while simultaneous milk flow is prevented.
Neuheuser AL; Belo C; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Oct; 100(10):8609-8613. PubMed ID: 28822550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decreased milk yield is associated with delayed milk ejection.
Erskine RJ; Norby B; Neuder LM; Thomson RS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jul; 102(7):6477-6484. PubMed ID: 31030923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors affecting milk flow traits in dairy cows: results of a field study.
Sandrucci A; Tamburini A; Bava L; Zucali M
J Dairy Sci; 2007 Mar; 90(3):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17297090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review: Milking machine settings, teat condition and milking efficiency in dairy cows.
Odorčić M; Rasmussen MD; Paulrud CO; Bruckmaier RM
Animal; 2019 Jul; 13(S1):s94-s99. PubMed ID: 31280747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Milk-flow data collected routinely in an automatic milking system: an alternative to milking-time testing in the management of teat-end condition?
Nørstebø H; Rachah A; Dalen G; Rønningen O; Whist AC; Reksen O
Acta Vet Scand; 2018 Jan; 60(1):2. PubMed ID: 29325588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Herd-level variables associated with delayed milk ejection in Michigan dairy herds.
Moore-Foster R; Norby B; Schewe RL; Thomson R; Bartlett PC; Erskine RJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):696-705. PubMed ID: 30343911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition.
Ambord S; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3588-94. PubMed ID: 20655427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of 2 different premilking stimulation regimens, with and without manual forestripping, on teat tissue condition and milking performance in Holstein dairy cows milked 3 times daily.
Wieland M; Virkler PD; Weld A; Melvin JM; Wettstein MR; Oswald MF; Geary CM; Watters RD; Lynch R; Nydam DV
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9548-9560. PubMed ID: 32828498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Type of teat cup liner and cluster ventilation affect vacuum conditions in the liner and milking performance in dairy cows.
Holst GE; Adrion F; Umstätter C; Bruckmaier RM
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4775-4786. PubMed ID: 33612232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
