227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34201861)
1. The Promise of Sleep: A Multi-Sensor Approach for Accurate Sleep Stage Detection Using the Oura Ring.
Altini M; Kinnunen H
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34201861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AI-Driven sleep staging from actigraphy and heart rate.
Song TA; Chowdhury SR; Malekzadeh M; Harrison S; Hoge TB; Redline S; Stone KL; Saxena R; Purcell SM; Dutta J
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285703. PubMed ID: 37195925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heart Rate Variability and Firstbeat Method for Detecting Sleep Stages in Healthy Young Adults: Feasibility Study.
Kuula L; Pesonen AK
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Feb; 9(2):e24704. PubMed ID: 33533726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs.
Svensson T; Madhawa K; Nt H; Chung UI; Svensson AK
Sleep Med; 2024 Mar; 115():251-263. PubMed ID: 38382312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults.
Fonseca P; Weysen T; Goelema MS; Møst EIS; Radha M; Lunsingh Scheurleer C; van den Heuvel L; Aarts RM
Sleep; 2017 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 28838130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography.
de Zambotti M; Rosas L; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Behav Sleep Med; 2019; 17(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28323455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography.
Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA
J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of a multisensor smart ring to evaluate sleep: in-lab and home-based evaluation of generalized and personalized algorithms.
Grandner MA; Bromberg Z; Hadley A; Morrell Z; Graf A; Hutchison S; Freckleton D
Sleep; 2023 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 35767600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sleep staging based on autonomic signals: a multi-center validation study.
Hedner J; White DP; Malhotra A; Herscovici S; Pittman SD; Zou D; Grote L; Pillar G
J Clin Sleep Med; 2011 Jun; 7(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 21677901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.
Chee NIYN; Ghorbani S; Golkashani HA; Leong RLF; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Nat Sci Sleep; 2021; 13():177-190. PubMed ID: 33623459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automated sleep stage classification based on tracheal body sound and actigraphy.
Kalkbrenner C; Brucher R; Kesztyüs T; Eichenlaub M; Rottbauer W; Scharnbeck D
Ger Med Sci; 2019; 17():Doc02. PubMed ID: 30996721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of wearable sleep trackers during nocturnal sleep and periods of simulated real-world smartphone use.
Willoughby AR; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Jun; 10(3):356-368. PubMed ID: 38570223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.
Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults.
Kanady JC; Ruoff L; Straus LD; Varbel J; Metzler T; Richards A; Inslicht SS; O'Donovan A; Hlavin J; Neylan TC
J Clin Sleep Med; 2020 Jun; 16(6):917-924. PubMed ID: 32048595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR
Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
