These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3420254)

  • 21. [Bases for cost calculations in x-ray facilities].
    Bossard F
    Radiologe; 1985 Jun; 25(6):284-7. PubMed ID: 4023213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-benefit evaluation of body computed tomography.
    Moore AT; Dixon AK; Rubenstein D; Wheeler T
    Health Trends; 1987 Aug; 19(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 10312239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus high-osmolality contrast media.
    Kinnison ML; Powe NR; Steinberg EP
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 2643140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast material for intravenous use in patients perceived to be at high risk: randomized trial.
    Barrett BJ; Parfrey PS; McDonald JR; Hefferton DM; Reddy ER; McManamon PJ
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 1549654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calculation of internal costs in a department of diagnostic radiology.
    Geitung JT; Göthlin JH; Uhde A; Aslaksen A
    Eur J Radiol; 1988 Aug; 8(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 3139411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prospective evaluation of adverse reactions to iodine-containing contrast media after ERCP.
    Draganov PV; Forsmark CE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Dec; 68(6):1098-101. PubMed ID: 19028218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assessment of randomized controlled trials of contrast media.
    Powe NR; Kinnison ML; Steinberg EP
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):377-80. PubMed ID: 2911662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Late reactions to a radiologic contrast media (Iopamidol-Bracco). Prospective study].
    Bartolucci F; Cecarini M; Gabrielli G; Abbiati R; Barberio M; Busilacchi P
    Radiol Med; 2000 Oct; 100(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11155455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adverse reactions to contrast media in CT: effects of temperature and ionic property.
    Vergara M; Seguel S
    Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 8668779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cost/need relations in medicine. Reuse of re-sterilized intravascular catheters].
    Wenz W; Daschner F
    Radiologe; 1987 Jul; 27(7):297-300. PubMed ID: 3671722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media.
    Mikkonen R; Kontkanen T; Kivisaari L
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 7833173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Adverse reactions to low osmolar iodine contrast media].
    Katayama H; Kuwatsuru R; Sumie H; Sumi Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Jun; 51(6):632-42. PubMed ID: 1886751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New dyes' higher costs cause controversy.
    Wagner M
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Jan; 19(3):45. PubMed ID: 10291656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Prospective study of adverse reactions to contrast media administered intravenously--a comparison of low-osmolality and high-osmolality contrast media].
    Higashi S; Takizawa K; Suzuki S; Nagashima J; Tamura S; Ishikawa M; Obuchi M; Katayama M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Nov; 48(11):1364-70. PubMed ID: 3237463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Low osmolar (non-ionic) contrast media versus high osmolar (ionic) contrast media in intravenous urography and enhanced computerized tomography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wangsuphachart S
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1991 Dec; 22(4):664-76. PubMed ID: 1820658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selective use of low-osmolality contrast media in computed tomography.
    Valls C; Andía E; Sánchez A; Moreno V
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Aug; 13(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 12942301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP; Dick TJ; Simms SM; Thrall JH
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Blues' consumer slant, tougher cost controls, strain hospital relations.
    LaViolette S
    Mod Healthc; 1979 Jun; 9(6):34-6. PubMed ID: 571520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. National Institutes of Health and academic radiology: a view from the inside.
    Doppman JL
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):281-2. PubMed ID: 2928540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media.
    Cochran ST; Bomyea K; Sayre JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jun; 176(6):1385-8. PubMed ID: 11373197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.