BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34202948)

  • 1. Comparison of Physiological Responses and Training Load between Different CrossFit
    Toledo R; Dias MR; Toledo R; Erotides R; Pinto DS; Reis VM; Novaes JS; Vianna JM; Heinrich KM
    Life (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34202948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differential improvements between men and women in repeated CrossFit open workouts.
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0283910. PubMed ID: 38015875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Seay TR
    Front Sports Act Living; 2022; 4():949429. PubMed ID: 36311217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of a pre-and post-workout protein-carbohydrate supplement in trained crossfit individuals.
    Outlaw JJ; Wilborn CD; Smith-Ryan AE; Hayward SE; Urbina SL; Taylor LW; Foster CA
    Springerplus; 2014; 3():369. PubMed ID: 25110627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Systematic Review of CrossFit® Workouts and Dietary and Supplementation Interventions to Guide Nutritional Strategies and Future Research in CrossFit®.
    de Souza RAS; da Silva AG; de Souza MF; Souza LKF; Roschel H; da Silva SF; Saunders B
    Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab; 2021 Mar; 31(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 33513565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training.
    Tibana RA; de Sousa NMF; Cunha GV; Prestes J; Fett C; Gabbett TJ; Voltarelli FA
    Sports (Basel); 2018 Jul; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 30041435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lactate, Heart Rate and Rating of Perceived Exertion Responses to Shorter and Longer Duration CrossFit
    Tibana RA; De Sousa NMF; Prestes J; Voltarelli FA
    J Funct Morphol Kinesiol; 2018 Nov; 3(4):. PubMed ID: 33466988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived demands and postexercise physical dysfunction in CrossFit® compared to an ACSM based training session.
    Drum SN; Bellovary BN; Jensen RL; Moore MT; Donath L
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 May; 57(5):604-609. PubMed ID: 26954573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normative Scores for CrossFit
    Mangine GT; Grundlingh N; Feito Y
    Sports (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 36828309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physiological responses after two different CrossFit workouts.
    Forte LDM; Freire YGC; Júnior JSDS; Melo DA; Meireles CLS
    Biol Sport; 2022 Mar; 39(2):231-236. PubMed ID: 35309530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Session-RPE for quantifying the load of different youth basketball training sessions.
    Lupo C; Tessitore A; Gasperi L; Gomez M
    Biol Sport; 2017 Mar; 34(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 28416891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise.
    Bellar D; Hatchett A; Judge LW; Breaux ME; Marcus L
    Biol Sport; 2015 Nov; 32(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 26681834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiometabolic and Muscular Fatigue Responses to Different CrossFit® Workouts.
    Maté-Muñoz JL; Lougedo JH; Barba M; Cañuelo-Márquez AM; Guodemar-Pérez J; García-Fernández P; Lozano-Estevan MDC; Alonso-Melero R; Sánchez-Calabuig MA; Ruíz-López M; de Jesús F; Garnacho-Castaño MV
    J Sports Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 17(4):668-679. PubMed ID: 30479537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of caffeine supplementation on exercise performance, power, markers of muscle damage, and perceived exertion in trained CrossFit men: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.
    Fogaça LJ; Santos SL; Soares RC; Gentil P; Naves JP; Dos Santos WD; Pimentel GD; Bottaro M; Mota JF
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2020 Feb; 60(2):181-188. PubMed ID: 31665873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit
    Dexheimer JD; Schroeder ET; Sawyer BJ; Pettitt RW; Aguinaldo AL; Torrence WA
    Sports (Basel); 2019 Apr; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 31013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute Caffeine Supplementation Does Not Improve Performance in Trained CrossFit
    Stein JA; Ramirez M; Heinrich KM
    Sports (Basel); 2020 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 32340121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CrossFit
    Meier N; Schlie J; Schmidt A
    Sports (Basel); 2023 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 37368562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting changes in high-intensity intermittent running performance with acute responses to short jump rope workouts in children.
    Buchheit M; Rabbani A; Beigi HT
    J Sports Sci Med; 2014 Sep; 13(3):476-82. PubMed ID: 25177172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Contributions in an Extreme Intensity CrossFit
    Rios M; Becker KM; Cardoso F; Pyne DB; Reis VM; Moreira-Gonçalves D; Fernandes RJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38257605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physiological load associated with a Zumba(®) fitness workout: a comparison pilot study between classes and a DVD.
    Delextrat A; Neupert E
    J Sports Sci; 2016; 34(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 25854638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.