163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34206613)
1. Combined Naïve Bayesian, Chemical Fingerprints and Molecular Docking Classifiers to Model and Predict Androgen Receptor Binding Data for Environmentally- and Health-Sensitive Substances.
García-Sosa AT; Maran U
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 34206613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computational models to predict endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with androgen or oestrogen receptors.
Chen Y; Cheng F; Sun L; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2014 Dec; 110():280-7. PubMed ID: 25282305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocrine Disruption at the Androgen Receptor: Employing Molecular Dynamics and Docking for Improved Virtual Screening and Toxicity Prediction.
Wahl J; Smieško M
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Jun; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 29914135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Molecular Docking for Predictive Toxicology.
Trisciuzzi D; Alberga D; Leonetti F; Novellino E; Nicolotti O; Mangiatordi GF
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():181-197. PubMed ID: 29934893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular interactions of vinclozolin metabolites with human estrogen receptors 1GWR-α and 1QKM and androgen receptor 2AM9-β: Implication for endocrine disruption.
Habib H; Haider MR; Sharma S; Ahmad S; Dabeer S; Yar MS; Raisuddin S
Toxicol Mech Methods; 2020 Jun; 30(5):370-377. PubMed ID: 32208804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In Silico Molecular Docking and In Vivo Validation with
Jeong J; Kim H; Choi J
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 30857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human sex hormone-binding globulin binding affinities of 125 structurally diverse chemicals and comparison with their binding to androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, and α-fetoprotein.
Hong H; Branham WS; Ng HW; Moland CL; Dial SL; Fang H; Perkins R; Sheehan D; Tong W
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):333-48. PubMed ID: 25349334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting Potential Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Binding to Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) Using a Pipeline Combining Structure-Based and Ligand-Based in Silico Methods.
Sellami A; Montes M; Lagarde N
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Mar; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33799614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quick and efficient quantitative predictions of androgen receptor binding affinity for screening Endocrine Disruptor Chemicals using 2D-QSAR and Chemical Read-Across.
Banerjee A; De P; Kumar V; Kar S; Roy K
Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 309(Pt 1):136579. PubMed ID: 36174732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative structure activity relationship studies of androgen receptor binding affinity of endocrine disruptor chemicals with index of ideality of correlation, their molecular docking, molecular dynamics and ADME studies.
Goyal S; Rani P; Chahar M; Hussain K; Kumar P; Sindhu J
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2023; 41(23):13616-13631. PubMed ID: 37010991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-based virtual screening of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) as endocrine disruptors of androgen receptor activity using molecular docking and machine learning.
Azhagiya Singam ER; Tachachartvanich P; Fourches D; Soshilov A; Hsieh JCY; La Merrill MA; Smith MT; Durkin KA
Environ Res; 2020 Nov; 190():109920. PubMed ID: 32795691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In silico investigations of anti-androgen activity of polychlorinated biphenyls.
Li X; Ye L; Wang X; Shi W; Liu H; Qian X; Zhu Y; Yu H
Chemosphere; 2013 Aug; 92(7):795-802. PubMed ID: 23664479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine Learning Consensus To Predict the Binding to the Androgen Receptor within the CoMPARA Project.
Grisoni F; Consonni V; Ballabio D
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1839-1848. PubMed ID: 30668916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists.
Li J; Gramatica P
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 20405856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hits Discovery on the Androgen Receptor: In Silico Approaches to Identify Agonist Compounds.
Réau M; Lagarde N; Zagury JF; Montes M
Cells; 2019 Nov; 8(11):. PubMed ID: 31766271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Androgen and Progesterone Receptors Are Targets for Bisphenol A (BPA), 4-Methyl-2,4-bis-(P-Hydroxyphenyl)Pent-1-Ene--A Potent Metabolite of BPA, and 4-Tert-Octylphenol: A Computational Insight.
Rehan M; Ahmad E; Sheikh IA; Abuzenadah AM; Damanhouri GA; Bajouh OS; AlBasri SF; Assiri MM; Beg MA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138438. PubMed ID: 26379041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Ligand/Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Steroidal Androgen Receptor Antagonists.
Wang Y; Han R; Zhang H; Liu H; Li J; Liu H; Gramatica P
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():3572394. PubMed ID: 28293633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Competitive molecular docking approach for predicting estrogen receptor subtype α agonists and antagonists.
Ng HW; Zhang W; Shu M; Luo H; Ge W; Perkins R; Tong W; Hong H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014; 15 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S4. PubMed ID: 25349983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational studies of interactions between endocrine disrupting chemicals and androgen receptor of different vertebrate species.
Wu B; Ford T; Gu JD; Zhang XX; Li AM; Cheng SP
Chemosphere; 2010 Jul; 80(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 20546840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-based discovery of the endocrine disrupting effects of hydraulic fracturing chemicals as novel androgen receptor antagonists.
Tachachartvanich P; Azhagiya Singam ER; Durkin KA; Smith MT; La Merrill MA
Chemosphere; 2020 Oct; 257():127178. PubMed ID: 32505947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
