These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34207229)

  • 1. No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Synthesized Images Based on Visual-Entropy-Guided Multi-Layer Features Analysis.
    Jin C; Peng Z; Zou W; Chen F; Jiang G; Yu M
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Jun; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 34207229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model-Based Referenceless Quality Metric of 3D Synthesized Images Using Local Image Description.
    Ke Gu ; Jakhetiya V; Jun-Fei Qiao ; Xiaoli Li ; Weisi Lin ; Thalmann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Jan; 27(1):394-405. PubMed ID: 28767368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DIBR-Synthesized Image Quality Assessment With Texture and Depth Information.
    Wang G; Shi Q; Shao Y; Tang L
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():761610. PubMed ID: 34803593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind Quality Metric of DIBR-Synthesized Images in the Discrete Wavelet Transform Domain.
    Wang G; Wang Z; Gu K; Li L; Xia Z; Wu L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 31613757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast Blind Quality Assessment of DIBR-Synthesized Video Based on High-High Wavelet Subband.
    Sandic-Stankovic DD; Kukolj DD; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Nov; 28(11):5524-5536. PubMed ID: 31180890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining Local and Global Measures for DIBR-Synthesized Image Quality Evaluation.
    Yue G; Hou C; Gu K; Zhou T; Zhai G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 30334759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sparse Representation based Video Quality Assessment for Synthesized 3D Videos.
    Zhang Y; Zhang H; Yu M; Kwong S; Ho YS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 31369374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blind Quality Prediction for View Synthesis Based on Heterogeneous Distortion Perception.
    Shi H; Wang L; Wang G
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Sep; 22(18):. PubMed ID: 36146438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning-Based Synthesized View Quality Enhancement with DIBR Distortion Mask Prediction Using Synthetic Images.
    Zhang H; Cao J; Zheng D; Yao X; Ling BW
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 36365828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cubemap-Based Perception-Driven Blind Quality Assessment for 360-degree Images.
    Jiang H; Jiang G; Yu M; Zhang Y; Yang Y; Peng Z; Chen F; Zhang Q
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():2364-2377. PubMed ID: 33481711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Entropy Based Data Expansion Method for Blind Image Quality Assessment.
    Guan X; He L; Li M; Li F
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33285835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No-Reference Quality Assessment for View Synthesis Using DoG-based Edge Statistics and Texture Naturalness.
    Zhou Y; Li L; Wang S; Wu J; Fang Y; Gao X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 31034415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. TOPIQ: A Top-Down Approach From Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessment.
    Chen C; Mo J; Hou J; Wu H; Liao L; Sun W; Yan Q; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():2404-2418. PubMed ID: 38517711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality Assessment of DIBR-Synthesized Views Based on Sparsity of Difference of Closings and Difference of Gaussians.
    Sandic-Stankovic DD; Kukolj DD; Le Callet P
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1161-1175. PubMed ID: 34990360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-Efficiency 3D Depth Coding Based on Perceptual Quality of Synthesized Video.
    Yun Zhang ; Xiaoxiang Yang ; Xiangkai Liu ; Yongbing Zhang ; Gangyi Jiang ; Sam Kwong
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Dec; 25(12):5877-5891. PubMed ID: 28113503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptually Unimportant Information Reduction and Cosine Similarity-Based Quality Assessment of 3D-Synthesized Images.
    Sadbhawna ; Jakhetiya V; Chaudhary S; Subudhi BN; Lin W; Guntuku SC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():2027-2039. PubMed ID: 35167450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D planar representation of stereo depth images for 3DTV applications.
    Özkalaycı BO; Alatan AA
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2014 Dec; 23(12):5222-32. PubMed ID: 25265630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment.
    Chang HW; Yang H; Gan Y; Wang MH
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Oct; 22(10):4007-18. PubMed ID: 23751962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image Quality Assessment Based on Local Linear Information and Distortion-Specific Compensation.
    Hanli Wang ; Jie Fu ; Weisi Lin ; Sudeng Hu ; Jay Kuo CC; Lingxuan Zuo
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Feb; 26(2):915-926. PubMed ID: 28113319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.