These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3421077)

  • 1. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.
    Schreurs BW; Spierings PT; Huiskes R; Slooff TJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 3421077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
    Hansen D; Jensen JS
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Feb; 63(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties.
    Smeds S; Goertzen D; Ivarsson I
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):326-34. PubMed ID: 9005930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
    Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
    J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
    Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
    Davies JP; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there any difference between vacuum mixing systems in reducing bone cement porosity?
    Wang JS; Toksvig-Larsen S; Müller-Wille P; Franźen H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996; 33(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8736030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.
    Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kaltenkirchen N
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1996; 115(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 8861576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental attempts to reduce acrylic cement porosity.
    Keller JC; Lautenschlager EP
    Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1983; 11(2-3):221-36. PubMed ID: 6667326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison and optimization of three centrifugation systems for reducing porosity of Simplex P bone cement.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Greer JA; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1989; 4(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 2926404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing.
    Macaulay W; DiGiovanni CW; Restrepo A; Saleh KJ; Walsh H; Crossett LS; Peterson MG; Li S; Salvati EA
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):569-75. PubMed ID: 12168171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical versus manual mixing of bone cement.
    Lindén U
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):400-2. PubMed ID: 3421076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The apparent fracture toughness of acrylic bone cement: effect of three variables.
    Lewis G; Nyman J; Trieu HH
    Biomaterials; 1998 May; 19(10):961-7. PubMed ID: 9690838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation.
    Davies JP; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1989 Apr; 23(4):379-97. PubMed ID: 2708414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.
    Fritsch EW
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Aug; 31(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8836840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do we need to vacuum mix or centrifuge cement?
    Wixson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):84-90. PubMed ID: 1446459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roentgenographic and mechanical performance of centrifuged cement in a simulated total hip arthroplasty model.
    Chao EY; Chin HC; Stauffer RN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Dec; (285):91-101. PubMed ID: 1446460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative fatigue behavior of different bone cements.
    Gates EI; Carter DR; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1984 Oct; (189):294-9. PubMed ID: 6478701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated system for preparation of bone cement and effects on cement quality and environment.
    Müller-Wille P; Wang JS; Lidgren L
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997; 38(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 9178741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of various vacuum mixing systems and bone cements as regards reliability, porosity and bending strength.
    Mau H; Schelling K; Heisel C; Wang JS; Breusch SJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Apr; 75(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15180231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.