These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34214085)

  • 1. This outcome feels right! subjective evaluations of coin flip outcomes reflect previously stated preferences.
    Jaffé ME; Greifeneder R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253751. PubMed ID: 34214085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deciding advantageously after flipping a coin.
    Jaffé ME; Greifeneder R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103511. PubMed ID: 35077952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Catalyzing decisions: How a coin flip strengthens affective reactions.
    Jaffé ME; Reutner L; Greifeneder R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220736. PubMed ID: 31412059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. This feels like the right choice: how decision aids may facilitate affect-based valuation.
    Jaffé ME; Douneva M; Reutner L; Greifeneder R
    Cogn Emot; 2022 Sep; 36(6):1218-1237. PubMed ID: 35652429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients who want their family and physician to make resuscitation decisions for them: observations from SUPPORT and HELP. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project.
    Puchalski CM; Zhong Z; Jacobs MM; Fox E; Lynn J; Harrold J; Galanos A; Phillips RS; Califf R; Teno JM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S84-90. PubMed ID: 10809461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives.
    Batson CD; Thompson ER; Chen H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Aug; 83(2):330-9. PubMed ID: 12150231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memories of the Future. Predictable and Unpredictable Information in Fractional Flipping a Biased Coin.
    Volchenkov D
    Entropy (Basel); 2019 Aug; 21(8):. PubMed ID: 33267520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of adolescents and young adults' preferences and priorities for future cancer treatment using a novel decision-making tool.
    Snaman JM; Helton G; Holder RL; Revette A; Baker JN; Wolfe J
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2021 Jan; 68(1):e28755. PubMed ID: 33017087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing Selection of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Development of an Online Patient Decision Aid Using Conjoint Analysis.
    Almario CV; Keller MS; Chen M; Lasch K; Ursos L; Shklovskaya J; Melmed GY; Spiegel BMR
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 113(1):58-71. PubMed ID: 29206816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and pilot of a decision-aid for patients with bipolar II disorder and their families making decisions about treatment options to prevent relapse.
    Fisher A; Sharpe L; Anderson J; Manicavasagar V; Juraskova I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200490. PubMed ID: 29990368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Warmth of familiarity and chill of error: affective consequences of recognition decisions.
    Chetverikov A
    Cogn Emot; 2014 Apr; 28(3):385-415. PubMed ID: 24044594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health Preference Research in Europe: A Review of Its Use in Marketing Authorization, Reimbursement, and Pricing Decisions-Report of the ISPOR Stated Preference Research Special Interest Group.
    Marsh K; van Til JA; Molsen-David E; Juhnke C; Hawken N; Oehrlein EM; Choi YC; Duenas A; Greiner W; Haas K; Hiligsmann M; Hockley KS; Ivlev I; Liu F; Ostermann J; Poder T; Poon JL; Muehlbacher A
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):831-841. PubMed ID: 32762984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Yielding to desire: the durability of affective preferences.
    Rapp DN; Jacovina ME; Slaten DG; Krause E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1419-31. PubMed ID: 24933694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are intertemporal preferences contagious? Evidence from collaborative decision making.
    Bixter MT; Trimber EM; Luhmann CC
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):837-851. PubMed ID: 28265901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dilemma that cannot be resolved by biased quantum coin flipping.
    Ishizaka S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2008 Feb; 100(7):070501. PubMed ID: 18352530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Mucosal impaction of a gastric foreign body (a coin)].
    Dayoub A; Maurage C; Bergeat MA; Dubos J; Ployet MJ; Rolland JC
    Chir Pediatr; 1990; 31(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 2081369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Feasibility of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study.
    Kim AH; Girgis A; De Cruz P; Siegel CA; Karimi N; Ruban SO; Sechi AJ; Ng WSW; Andrews JM; Connor SJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Feb; 23(2):e15946. PubMed ID: 33629956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online, Interactive Option Grid Patient Decision Aids and their Effect on User Preferences.
    Scalia P; Durand MA; Kremer J; Faber M; Elwyn G
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 29078054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.