These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3421475)

  • 1. A study of cranio-facial indices in Uttar Pradesh crania.
    Jeyasingh P; Agarwal AK; Gupta SC; Arora AK; Gupta CD
    Anat Anz; 1988; 165(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 3421475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cranial deformation on facial morphology among prehistoric South Central Andean populations.
    Rhode MP; Arriaza BT
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Aug; 130(4):462-70. PubMed ID: 16444729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot study on assessment of racial affinity of Sri Lankan population using discriminant function statistics and a few established morphological racial traits.
    Perera P; Pathmeswaran A
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2009 Apr; 11 Suppl 1():S182-5. PubMed ID: 19261526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cephalometric study of 500 adult male medical students of Uttar Pradesh.
    Saxena SK; Jeyasingh P; Ajmani ML; Srivastava AK; Gupta CD
    Anthropol Anz; 1984 Mar; 42(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 6721458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intentional cranial vault deformation and induced changes of the cranial base and face.
    Anton SC
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Jun; 79(2):253-67. PubMed ID: 2662783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Craniometric studies on the functional morphology of the atlanto-occipital joint in man. Part II. Data and correlations].
    bernhard W
    Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1976; 122(4):497-534. PubMed ID: 1010282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation coefficients in human skulls: significant sexual differences.
    Rude J; Mertzlufft FO
    Anthropol Anz; 1987 Dec; 45(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 3435091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of cranial variations based on craniometric indices in a South Indian population.
    Kanchan T; Krishan K; Gupta A; Acharya J
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1645-9. PubMed ID: 25162547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters.
    Ekizoglu O; Hocaoglu E; Inci E; Can IO; Solmaz D; Aksoy S; Buran CF; Sayin I
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Jul; 21():45-52. PubMed ID: 27497333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape.
    Lieberman DE; Pearson OM; Mowbray KM
    J Hum Evol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):291-315. PubMed ID: 10656780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cranial capacity/cranial base relationships and prediction of vault form: a canonical correlation analysis.
    Taylor JV; DiBennardo R
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1980 Jul; 53(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 6998301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of nasolacrimal canal in crania from Uttar Pradesh (India).
    Saxena SK
    Anthropol Anz; 1984 Dec; 42(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 6529250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary study on cranial measurements and sexual dimorphism in skull bones of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus, Smith 1827).
    Vishwakarma R; Sharma CP; Mondol S; Habib B; Bhandari B; Mishra R; Gupta N; Chauhan JS; Nigam P
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2024 May; 53(3):e13031. PubMed ID: 38519866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Craniofacial variation in Australasian and Pacific populations.
    Pietrusewsky M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1990 Jul; 82(3):319-40. PubMed ID: 2375383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of epigenetic variants in the Northern Indian crania.
    Jeyasingh P; Dua S; Arora AK; Gupta CD
    Anthropol Anz; 1980 Aug; 38(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 7416721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical and spatial determinants of Paranthropus facial form.
    McCollum MA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Feb; 93(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 8147440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between craniofacial templates of Iranian and western populations.
    Akhoundi MS; Chalipa J; Hashemi R; Nik TH; Sodagar A; Afzalifar R
    Acta Med Iran; 2012; 50(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 22359083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Estimation of fetal age from craniofacial dimensions].
    Guihard-Costa AM
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1988; 72(217-218):15-9. PubMed ID: 3240366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The craniofacial morphology of bruxers versus nonbruxers.
    Young DV; Rinchuse DJ; Pierce CJ; Zullo T
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 10022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A metric analysis of Mumbai region (India) crania.
    Salve VM; Chandrashekhar CH
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2012 Oct; 110(10):690-3. PubMed ID: 23738400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.