168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3421507)
1. Experimental evaluation of the mitroflow pericardial heart valve prosthesis. Part II. Pathologic examination.
Hassoulas J; Rose AG
Angiology; 1988 Aug; 39(8):733-41. PubMed ID: 3421507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental evaluation of the mitroflow pericardial heart valve prosthesis. Part I. In vivo hemodynamic evaluation.
Hassoulas J; Ayzenberg O
Angiology; 1988 Aug; 39(8):725-32. PubMed ID: 3421506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
Fiore A; Cooley DA; Grande AM; Viganò M; Angelini P
Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mode of failure of the Mitroflow pericardial valve.
Leandri J; Bertrand P; Mazzucotelli JP; Loisance D
J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Nov; 1(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 1341633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pericardial heterografts: why do these valves fail?
Trowbridge EA; Lawford PV; Crofts CE; Roberts KM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Apr; 95(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 3352291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fatigue-induced failure of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft in the mitral position. In vivo and in vitro correlation and a proposed classification.
Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor S; Strom J; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jun; 87(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 6727407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Structure of bovine parietal pericardium and of unimplanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valvular bioprostheses.
Ishihara T; Ferrans VJ; Jones M; Boyce SW; Roberts WC
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 May; 81(5):747-57. PubMed ID: 7218840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long term clinical and haemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft heart valve.
Ionescu MI; Tandon AP
Thoraxchir Vask Chir; 1978 Aug; 26(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 694896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early calcific stenosis of aortic and mitral Ionescu-Shiley valves in a patient with bioprosthetic infection.
Williams EH; Gonti VR; Nishimura A; Stout LC; Ferrans V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Sep; 82(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 7278328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Histologic and ultrastructural studies.
Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; McAllister HA; Cooley DA
Am J Pathol; 1992 May; 140(5):1195-204. PubMed ID: 1580331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ionescu-Shiley valve failure. I: Experience with 125 standard-profile explants.
Walley VM; Keon CA; Khalili M; Moher D; Campagna M; Keon WJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 1992 Jul; 54(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 1610221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valve failure caused by cusp tears in low-profile Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
Walley VM; Bédard P; Brais M; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Apr; 93(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 3550298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Twenty-six-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley standard profile pericardial aortic valve.
Honda K; Okamura Y; Nishimura Y; Uchita S
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):315-6. PubMed ID: 19914926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A morphologic study of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial xenografts in the mitral position exhibiting primary tissue failure in adults in comparison with Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenografts.
Machida H; Ishibashi-Ueda H; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Bando K; Minatoya K; Imamura H; Kitamura S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 122(4):649-55. PubMed ID: 11581594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Porcine aortic vs. bovine pericardial valves: a morphologic study of the Xenomedica and Mitroflow bioprostheses.
Goffin YA; Bartik MA; Hilbert SL
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():213-22. PubMed ID: 3727689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive assessment of the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft heart valve.
Robertson J; Burggraf G
Can J Cardiol; 1985; 1(4):241-50. PubMed ID: 3850772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The behavior of pericardial versus porcine valve xenografts in the growing sheep model.
Gallo I; Nistal F; Artiñano E; Fernández D; Cayón R; Carrión M; García-Martínez V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
