BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34215921)

  • 1. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
    Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
    Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Analysis of Radiologic Outcomes Between Polyetheretherketone and Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Cages After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Sultana T; Hossain M; Jeong JH; Im S
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Nov; 179():e241-e255. PubMed ID: 37611804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature.
    Seaman S; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():23-29. PubMed ID: 28736113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduced Subsidence With PEEK-Titanium Composite Versus 3D Titanium Cages in a Retrospective, Self-Controlled Study in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Chahlavi A
    Global Spine J; 2024 May; ():21925682241253168. PubMed ID: 38780086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.
    Wang Z; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Miao J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38431. PubMed ID: 38905365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
    Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
    Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.
    Alan N; Vodovotz L; Muthiah N; Deng H; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Mushlin HM; Puccio L; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Nov; 37(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 35594892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography color mapping for evaluation of bone ongrowth on the surface of a titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage in vivo: A pilot study.
    Makino T; Kaito T; Sakai Y; Takenaka S; Yoshikawa H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(37):e12379. PubMed ID: 30213002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kim MC; Chung HT; Cho JL; Kim DJ; Chung NS
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23529151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study.
    Vanek P; Svoboda N; Bradac O; Malik J; Kaiser R; Netuka D
    Eur Spine J; 2024 Jan; 33(1):332-338. PubMed ID: 37737497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
    Yang JJ; Kim DM; Park S
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37419312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.