318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34215921)
21. The postoperative clinical effects of utilizing 3D printed (Ti6Al4V) interbody fusion cages in posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.
Wang Z; Zhang D; Zhang Z; Miao J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38431. PubMed ID: 38905365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature.
Massaad E; Fatima N; Kiapour A; Hadzipasic M; Shankar GM; Shin JH
Neurospine; 2020 Mar; 17(1):125-135. PubMed ID: 32252163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PEEK Versus Titanium Static Interbody Cages: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for 1-Level TLIFs.
Canseco JA; Karamian BA; Patel PD; Divi SN; Timmons T; Hallman H; Nachwalter R; Lee JK; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E483-E493. PubMed ID: 34369911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion using a 3D-printed porous titanium interbody cage: single-institution case series.
Alan N; Vodovotz L; Muthiah N; Deng H; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Mushlin HM; Puccio L; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Nov; 37(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 35594892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.
Wu H; Shan Z; Zhao F; Cheung JPY
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):163-188. PubMed ID: 34324459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Early revision events among patients with a three dimensional (3D) printed cellular titanium or PEEK (polyetheretherketone) spinal cage for single-level lumbar spinal fusion.
Corso KA; Kothari P; Corrado K; Michielli A; Ruppenkamp J; Bowden D
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Feb; 19(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 34937486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computed tomography color mapping for evaluation of bone ongrowth on the surface of a titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage in vivo: A pilot study.
Makino T; Kaito T; Sakai Y; Takenaka S; Yoshikawa H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(37):e12379. PubMed ID: 30213002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone cage after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Kim MC; Chung HT; Cho JL; Kim DJ; Chung NS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Apr; 26(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 23529151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical and radiological results of TLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective single-centre randomised study.
Vanek P; Svoboda N; Bradac O; Malik J; Kaiser R; Netuka D
Eur Spine J; 2024 Jan; 33(1):332-338. PubMed ID: 37737497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Fusion, Subsidence, and Clinical Results Between 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage and Polyetheretherketone Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Minimum of 2 Years Follow-Up.
Yang JJ; Kim DM; Park S
World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 37419312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of Polyetheretherketone and Titanium-Coated Polyetheretherketone in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Singhatanadgige W; Tangchitcharoen N; Kerr SJ; Tanasansomboon T; Yingsakmongkol W; Kotheeranurak V; Limthongkul W
World Neurosurg; 2022 Dec; 168():e471-e479. PubMed ID: 36216250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.
Tsai PI; Wu MH; Li YY; Lin TH; Tsai JSC; Huang HI; Lai HJ; Lee MH; Chen CY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):171. PubMed ID: 33573634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical comparison of polyetheretherketone rods and titanium alloy rods in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.
Li J; Cao S; Zhao B
BMC Surg; 2024 May; 24(1):169. PubMed ID: 38811965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
Hasegawa T; Ushirozako H; Shigeto E; Ohba T; Oba H; Mukaiyama K; Shimizu S; Yamato Y; Ide K; Shibata Y; Ojima T; Takahashi J; Haro H; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(15):E892-E902. PubMed ID: 32675599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of Long-term Follow-Up of n-HA PA66 Cage and PEEK Cage of Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multi-level Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Li Q; Gao Q; Wang L; Liu L; Yang H; Song Y
Orthop Surg; 2024 Jan; 16(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 37953456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. PLIF surgery with titanium-coated PEEK or uncoated PEEK cages: a prospective randomised clinical and radiological study.
Schnake KJ; Fleiter N; Hoffmann C; Pingel A; Scholz M; Langheinrich A; Kandziora F
Eur Spine J; 2021 Jan; 30(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 33091142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanical comparison of subsidence performance among three modern porous lateral cage designs.
Yee-Yanagishita C; Fogel G; Douglas B; Essayan G; Poojary B; Martin N; Williams GM; Peng Y; Jekir M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Oct; 99():105764. PubMed ID: 36130418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
