256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34216473)
1. Follow-up genotoxicity assessment of Ames-positive/equivocal chemicals using the improved thymidine kinase gene mutation assay in DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells.
Sassa A; Fukuda T; Ukai A; Nakamura M; Sato R; Fujiwara S; Hirota K; Takeda S; Sugiyama KI; Honma M; Yasui M
Mutagenesis; 2021 Oct; 36(5):331-338. PubMed ID: 34216473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancing the sensitivity of the thymidine kinase assay by using DNA repair-deficient human TK6 cells.
Ibrahim MA; Yasui M; Saha LK; Sasanuma H; Honma M; Takeda S
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2020 Jul; 61(6):602-610. PubMed ID: 32243652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study of oxidative DNA damage in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells by use of the thymidine kinase gene-mutation assay and the in vitro modified comet assay: determination of No-Observed-Genotoxic-Effect-Levels.
Platel A; Nesslany F; Gervais V; Claude N; Marzin D
Mutat Res; 2011 Dec; 726(2):151-9. PubMed ID: 21930235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential micronucleus frequency in isogenic human cells deficient in DNA repair pathways is a valuable indicator for evaluating genotoxic agents and their genotoxic mechanisms.
Saha LK; Kim S; Kang H; Akter S; Choi K; Sakuma T; Yamamoto T; Sasanuma H; Hirota K; Nakamura J; Honma M; Takeda S; Dertinger S
Environ Mol Mutagen; 2018 Jul; 59(6):529-538. PubMed ID: 29761828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():69-80. PubMed ID: 25435357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins.
Kirkland D; Reeve L; Gatehouse D; Vanparys P
Mutat Res; 2011 Mar; 721(1):27-73. PubMed ID: 21238603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel approach using DNA-repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines for screening and characterizing the genotoxicity of environmental contaminants.
Ji K; Kogame T; Choi K; Wang X; Lee J; Taniguchi Y; Takeda S
Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Nov; 117(11):1737-44. PubMed ID: 20049126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.
Sasaki YF; Sekihashi K; Izumiyama F; Nishidate E; Saga A; Ishida K; Tsuda S
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2000 Nov; 30(6):629-799. PubMed ID: 11145306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. BPDE-induced genotoxicity: relationship between DNA adducts, mutagenicity in the in vitro PIG-A assay, and the transcriptional response to DNA damage in TK6 cells.
Piberger AL; Krüger CT; Strauch BM; Schneider B; Hartwig A
Arch Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 92(1):541-551. PubMed ID: 28593498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A decision tree-based integrated testing strategy for tailor-made carcinogenicity evaluation of test substances using genotoxicity test results and chemical spaces.
Fujita Y; Honda H; Yamane M; Morita T; Matsuda T; Morita O
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 30551173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of an integrated assay in human TK6 cells to permit comprehensive genotoxicity analysis in vitro.
Smart DJ; Helbling FR; Verardo M; Huber A; McHugh D; Vanscheeuwijck P
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020 Jan; 849():503129. PubMed ID: 32087850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assay to detect DNA-damaging agents that induce nucleotide excision-repairable DNA lesions in living human cells.
Takatsuka R; Ito S; Iwai S; Kuraoka I
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2017 Aug; 820():1-7. PubMed ID: 28676261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Induction of TK mutations in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells by the rat carcinogen 3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone (MX).
Hakulinen P; Yamamoto A; Koyama N; Kumita W; Yasui M; Honma M
Mutat Res; 2011 Oct; 725(1-2):43-9. PubMed ID: 21784170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EURL ECVAM Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity Database of Substances Eliciting Negative Results in the Ames Test: Construction of the Database.
Madia F; Kirkland D; Morita T; White P; Asturiol D; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2020; 854-855():503199. PubMed ID: 32660827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of the in vivo Pig-a gene mutation assay to test the potential genotoxicity of p-phenylenediamine.
Qin M; Chen R; Huang Z; Wang J; Xu S; Jiang R; Li J; Xian J; Wang X; Lu Y; Xu L; Chen N; Chen X; Wang P; Wang T
Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Jan; 123():424-430. PubMed ID: 30439388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Weight of evidence approach using a TK gene mutation assay with human TK6 cells for follow-up of positive results in Ames tests: a collaborative study by MMS/JEMS.
Yasui M; Fukuda T; Ukai A; Maniwa J; Imamura T; Hashizume T; Yamamoto H; Shibuya K; Narumi K; Fujiishi Y; Okada E; Fujishima S; Yamamoto M; Otani N; Nakamura M; Nishimura R; Ueda M; Mishima M; Matsuzaki K; Takeiri A; Tanaka K; Okada Y; Nakagawa M; Hamada S; Kajikawa A; Honda H; Adachi J; Misaki K; Ogawa K; Honma M
Genes Environ; 2021 Mar; 43(1):7. PubMed ID: 33676587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Pfuhler S; Tweats D; Aardema M; Corvi R; Darroudi F; Elhajouji A; Glatt H; Hastwell P; Hayashi M; Kasper P; Kirchner S; Lynch A; Marzin D; Maurici D; Meunier JR; Müller L; Nohynek G; Parry J; Parry E; Thybaud V; Tice R; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; White P
Mutat Res; 2007 Mar; 628(1):31-55. PubMed ID: 17293159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? I. Reports of individual databases presented at an EURL ECVAM Workshop.
Kirkland D; Zeiger E; Madia F; Gooderham N; Kasper P; Lynch A; Morita T; Ouedraogo G; Parra Morte JM; Pfuhler S; Rogiers V; Schulz M; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Vanparys P; Worth A; Corvi R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2014 Dec; 775-776():55-68. PubMed ID: 25435356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
