152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3421670)
1. Proposed recommended practices. Product evaluation and selection for patient care in the practice setting.
AORN J; 1988 Jul; 48(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 3421670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Product selection in the OR. A decision-making model.
Baird MV
AORN J; 1988 Sep; 48(3):512-3, 516-7. PubMed ID: 3178196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Buy it right, use it right, keep it right!
Woodhead K
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2000 Aug; 10(8):389. PubMed ID: 11261002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality evaluation for purchasing.
Burton RJ; Link NA
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1992 Apr; 10(3):34, 36, 38 passim. PubMed ID: 10117225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Equipment acquisition: evaluating the prospects for manufacturer support. From ECRI's consultants.
Health Technol; 1988; 2(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 10287063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The selection and evaluation of supplies.
Stanley CB
Exec Housekeep Today; 1983 Jun; 4(6):11-4, 19. PubMed ID: 10260793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of product samples.
Kath SR
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1983 May; 4(4):43-6. PubMed ID: 10259476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed recommended practices. Product evaluation and selection for the perioperative setting. Recommended Practices Committee, Association of Operating Room Nurses, Inc.
AORN J; 1993 Aug; 58(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 8368820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Acquisitions to undergo closer scrutiny.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1997 Jun; 22(6):80-2. PubMed ID: 10167601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Product specifications.
McMullen RB
Hosp Mater Manage Q; 1983 Feb; 4(3):42-5. PubMed ID: 10258292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The nursing factor.
Thomson-Keith E
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1986 Jun; 10(6):33-4. PubMed ID: 10276748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Safe Medical Devices Act. What nurses should know about user reporting, implant tracking.
Koch FA; Solomon RP; Nash SE
AORN J; 1992 Feb; 55(2):537-48. PubMed ID: 1536545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Product testing. Groups take different views of evaluation.
Litsikas M
Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Jun; 14(6):1, 7-8. PubMed ID: 10324635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Product standardization: can it be accomplished--Part II.
HPN Hosp Purch News; 1984 Mar; 8(3):64-8. PubMed ID: 10265278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposed recommended practices for aseptic barrier materials for surgical drapes. From the Recommended Practices Subcommittee AORN.
AORN J; 1982 Apr; 35(5):906-11. PubMed ID: 6918211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Value analysis: every supervisor's responsibility.
Vallas AJ
Health Care Superv; 1983 Apr; 1(3):45-56. PubMed ID: 10261586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed recommended practices for selection and use of packaging systems.
AORN J; 1995 Mar; 61(3):605-8, 611-3. PubMed ID: 7778913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision on surgical textiles requires careful analysis.
OR Manager; 1994 Mar; 10(3):9. PubMed ID: 10132542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposed recommended practices. Basic aseptic technique.
AORN J; 1985 Oct; 42(4):566-75. PubMed ID: 3851643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Purchasing: Operating Room Products Standardization COmmittee of the Massachusetts General hospital.
Baloff E
Todays OR Nurse; 1982 Oct; 4(8):37-41, 55-6, 58. PubMed ID: 6923677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
