These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34216904)

  • 1. Spatial dependence and determinants of conservation easement adoptions in the United States.
    Lamichhane S; Sun C; Gordon JS; Grado SC; Poudel KP
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Oct; 296():113164. PubMed ID: 34216904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
    Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motivations influencing the adoption of conservation easements.
    Farmer JR; Knapp D; Meretsky VJ; Chancellor C; Fischer BC
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):827-34. PubMed ID: 21535148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Land management restrictions and options for change in perpetual conservation easements.
    Rissman A; Bihari M; Hamilton C; Locke C; Lowenstein D; Motew M; Price J; Smail R
    Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):277-88. PubMed ID: 23784713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservation easements: biodiversity protection and private use.
    Rissman AR; Lozier L; Comendant T; Kareiva P; Kiesecker JM; Shaw MR; Merenlender AM
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Jun; 21(3):709-18. PubMed ID: 17531049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protected area, easement, and rental contract data reveal five communities of land protection in the United States.
    Jackson HB; Kroetz K; Sanchirico JN; Thompson A; Armsworth PR
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02322. PubMed ID: 33655588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.
    Baldwin RF; Leonard PB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of disputes and easement violations on the cost-effectiveness of land conservation.
    Schuster R; Arcese P
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1185. PubMed ID: 26413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving inferences about private land conservation by accounting for incomplete reporting.
    Williamson MA; Dickson BG; Hooten MB; Graves RA; Lubell MN; Schwartz MW
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 33319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of conservation easements in agricultural regions.
    Braza M
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):848-859. PubMed ID: 28218793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The growth of easements as a conservation tool.
    Fishburn IS; Kareiva P; Gaston KJ; Armsworth PR
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(3):e4996. PubMed ID: 19325711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the success of hydrological restoration in two conservation easements within Central Florida ranchland.
    Sonnier G; Bohlen PJ; Swain HM; Orzell SL; Bridges EL; Boughton EH
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199333. PubMed ID: 29969464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An interdisciplinary assessment of private conservation areas in the Western United States.
    Quintas-Soriano C; Gibson DM; Brandt JS; López-Rodríguez MD; Cabello J; Aguilera PA; Castro AJ
    Ambio; 2021 Jan; 50(1):150-162. PubMed ID: 32086786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Landowner Satisfaction with the Wetland Reserve Program in Texas: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.
    Stroman D; Kreuter UP
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 26289350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bibliometric Analysis on Conservation Land Trust and Implication for China.
    Yang C; Li M; Wang Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36232039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
    Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landowner behavior can determine the success of conservation strategies for ecosystem migration under sea-level rise.
    Field CR; Dayer AA; Elphick CS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Aug; 114(34):9134-9139. PubMed ID: 28790190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios.
    Radeloff VC; Nelson E; Plantinga AJ; Lewis DJ; Helmers D; Lawler JJ; Withey JC; Beaudry F; Martinuzzi S; Butsic V; Lonsdorf E; White D; Polasky S
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Apr; 22(3):1036-49. PubMed ID: 22645830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.