These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34217258)

  • 1. Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.
    Montero-Moraga JM; Posso M; Román M; Burón A; Sala M; Castells X; Macià F
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):1301. PubMed ID: 34217258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Carles M; Martínez-Alonso M; Pons A; Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Perestelo-Pérez L; Sala M; Vidal C; Garcia M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Codern N; Feijoo-Cid M; Romero A; Pla R; Soler-González J; Castells X; Rué M;
    Trials; 2017 Sep; 18(1):426. PubMed ID: 28899412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
    Pérez-Lacasta MJ; Martínez-Alonso M; Garcia M; Sala M; Perestelo-Pérez L; Vidal C; Codern-Bové N; Feijoo-Cid M; Toledo-Chávarri A; Cardona À; Pons A; Carles-Lavila M; Rue M;
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214057. PubMed ID: 30913217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of text messages as an alternative invitation method for breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial (M-TICS study).
    Vives N; Vidal C; de Guzman EN; Farre A; Panera JA; Binefa G; Garcia M;
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0306720. PubMed ID: 39208325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group.
    Bourmaud A; Soler-Michel P; Oriol M; Regnier V; Tinquaut F; Nourissat A; Bremond A; Moumjid N; Chauvin F
    Oncotarget; 2016 Mar; 7(11):12885-92. PubMed ID: 26883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.
    Bonfill X; Marzo M; Pladevall M; Martí J; Emparanza JI
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; 2001(1):CD002943. PubMed ID: 11279781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.
    Allgood PC; Maroni R; Hudson S; Offman J; Turnbull AE; Peacock L; Steel J; Kirby G; Ingram CE; Somers J; Fuller C; Threlfall AG; Gabe R; Maxwell AJ; Patnick J; Duffy SW
    Lancet Oncol; 2017 Jul; 18(7):972-980. PubMed ID: 28522311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of altering the invitation package on screening participation among never-screeners in the Flemish population-based cancer screening programs.
    Kellen E; Meers Z; Pil L; Goossens MC
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2024 Mar; 33(2):181-184. PubMed ID: 38190189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mixed-methods study to evaluate the acceptability of information leaflets for breast cancer screening.
    Fernández-Feito A; Canga-Gutiérrez C; Paz-Zulueta M
    J Clin Nurs; 2021 Jun; 30(11-12):1760-1772. PubMed ID: 33655613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of different communication and organizational strategies on mammography screening uptake in women aged 40-45 years.
    Giordano L; Stefanini V; Senore C; Frigerio A; Castagno R; Marra V; Dalmasso M; del Turco MR; Paci E; Segnan N
    Eur J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 22(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21746751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preconceptions influence women's perceptions of information on breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.
    Henriksen MJ; Guassora AD; Brodersen J
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():404. PubMed ID: 26336075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
    Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child.
    Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H
    Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of socio-economic characteristics, diagnosis and outcome of women participating or not participating in mammogram screening.
    Padoan M; Ferrante D; Pretti G; Magnani C
    Ann Ig; 2014; 26(6):518-26. PubMed ID: 25524076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian Women's Intentions and Psychological Outcomes Related to Breast Density Notification and Information: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Dolan H; McCaffery K; Houssami N; Cvejic E; Brennan M; Hersch J; Dorrington M; Verde A; Vaccaro L; Nickel B
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2216784. PubMed ID: 35708691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
    Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
    J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a decision aid improve informed choice in mammography screening? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Reder M; Kolip P
    BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jul; 15():53. PubMed ID: 26198675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.