These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34217604)

  • 1. The role of self-evaluation and education of radiographers involved in a breast cancer screening program at Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka.
    Zujić PV; Božanić A; Jurković S; Šegota D; Dujmić EG; Čandrlić B; Karić M
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1162-1165. PubMed ID: 34217604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic positioning quality of newly trained versus experienced radiographers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme.
    van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; den Heeten GJ; Timmers J; Broeders MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Nov; 25(11):3322-7. PubMed ID: 25987428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of breast positioning criteria in mammographic screening: Agreement between artificial intelligence software and radiographers.
    Waade GG; Danielsen AS; Holen ÅS; Larsen M; Hanestad B; Hopland NM; Kalcheva V; Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2021 Dec; 28(4):448-455. PubMed ID: 33715511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can radiographers read screening mammograms?
    Wivell G; Denton ER; Eve CB; Inglis JC; Harvey I
    Clin Radiol; 2003 Jan; 58(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 12565207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographers supporting radiologists in the interpretation of screening mammography: a viable strategy to meet the shortage in the number of radiologists.
    Torres-Mejía G; Smith RA; Carranza-Flores Mde L; Bogart A; Martínez-Matsushita L; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Ortega-Olvera C; Montemayor-Varela E; Angeles-Llerenas A; Bautista-Arredondo S; Sánchez-González G; Martínez-Montañez OG; Uscanga-Sánchez SR; Lazcano-Ponce E; Hernández-Ávila M
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May; 15():410. PubMed ID: 25975383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Nelemans PJ; Flobbe K
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 17764941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An image quality review programme in a population-based mammography screening service.
    Galli V; Pini M; De Metrio D; de Bianchi PS; Bucchi L
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):253-259. PubMed ID: 34085397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic image quality in relation to positioning of the breast: A multicentre international evaluation of the assessment systems currently used, to provide an evidence base for establishing a standardised method of assessment.
    Taylor K; Parashar D; Bouverat G; Poulos A; Gullien R; Stewart E; Aarre R; Crystal P; Wallis M
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):343-349. PubMed ID: 28965899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography in females with an implanted medical device: impact on image quality, pain and anxiety.
    Paap E; Witjes M; van Landsveld-Verhoeven C; Pijnappel RM; Maas AH; Broeders MJ
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160142. PubMed ID: 27452263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of radiographers' mammography screen-reading accuracy in Australia.
    Debono JC; Poulos AE; Houssami N; Turner RM; Boyages J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Mar; 62(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 26229663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast compression techniques in screening mammography - A Maltese evaluation project.
    Cassar Agius E; Naylor S
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 Nov; 24(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 30292499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of image quality and motivation of radiographer teams in mammography after dedicated training and the use of an evaluation tool like PGMI.
    Santner T; Santner W; Gutzeit A
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Nov; 27(4):1124-1129. PubMed ID: 34120844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review of mammographic image quality in Papua New Guinea.
    Pape R; Spuur KM; Wilkinson JM; Zuhukepe A
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2022 Mar; 69(1):24-29. PubMed ID: 34418330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of individual radiographers on rates of attendance to breast screening: a 7-year retrospective study.
    Savaridas SL; Brook J; Codde JP; Bulsara M; Wylie E
    Clin Radiol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):413.e7-413.e13. PubMed ID: 29273227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptions of Australian clients towards male radiographers working in breast imaging: Quantitative results from a pilot study.
    Warren-Forward HM; Mackie B; Alchin M; Mooney T; Fitzpatrick P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 28290337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Image Quality and Sensitivity in an Organized Mammography Screening Program.
    Théberge I; Guertin MH; Vandal N; Daigle JM; Dufresne MP; Wadden N; Shumak R; Samson C; Langlois A; Larocque I; Perron L; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Feb; 69(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 29458953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Waade GG; Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160770. PubMed ID: 28102696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.