359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34217852)
21. Open versus laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in early stage cervical cancer: no difference in surgical or disease outcome.
van de Lande J; von Mensdorff-Pouilly S; Lettinga RG; Piek JM; Verheijen RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 21857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Therapeutic value of selective lymphadenectomy in interval debulking surgery for stage IIIc and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
Song N; Gao Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 May; 29(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 30850437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. False negative rate at
Gouy S; Seebacher V; Chargari C; Terroir M; Grimaldi S; Ilenko A; Maulard A; Genestie C; Leary A; Pautier P; Morice P; Deandreis D
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 33549033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treatment of bulky lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer: boosting versus debulking.
Olthof EP; Wenzel H; van der Velden J; Spijkerboer AM; Bekkers R; Beltman JJ; Nijman HW; Slangen B; Smolders R; van Trommel N; Zusterzeel PLM; Zweemer R; Stalpers LJA; van der Aa M; Mom C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Jul; 32(7):861-868. PubMed ID: 35483738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis in FIGO stage IA2-IB2 carcinoma of the cervix: Revisiting the role of surgical assessment.
Del Carmen MG; Pareja R; Melamed A; Rodriguez J; Greer A; Clark RM; Rice LW
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 150(3):406-411. PubMed ID: 30017539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of pre-therapy extraperitoneal surgical staging on the evaluation and treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Odunsi KO; Lele S; Ghamande S; Seago P; Driscoll DL
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2001; 22(5):325-30. PubMed ID: 11766731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Oncologic outcomes of surgical para-aortic lymph node staging in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma undergoing chemoradiation.
Nasioudis D; Rush M; Taunk NK; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Cory L; Giuntoli RL; Kim SH; Latif NA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Jul; 32(7):823-827. PubMed ID: 35788115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intra-operative frozen section analysis of common iliac lymph nodes in patients with stage IB1 and IIA1 cervical cancer.
Lv X; Chen L; Yu H; Zhang X; Yan D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 21837427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer?
Marnitz S; Köhler C; Roth C; Füller J; Hinkelbein W; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3):536-44. PubMed ID: 16126259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.
Ramirez PT; Jhingran A; Macapinlac HA; Euscher ED; Munsell MF; Coleman RL; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Frumovitz M; Ramondetta LM
Cancer; 2011 May; 117(9):1928-34. PubMed ID: 21509770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Para-aortic lymph node staging in grade IB2 and above cervical cancers: Comparison of 18FDG PET-CT with para-aortic lymphadenectomy, using data from the Côte d'Or gynaecological cancer registry from 2003 to 2016].
Carré A; Sellier J; Kamga AM; Dabakuyo S; Rouffiac M; Coutant C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2021 Sep; 49(9):677-683. PubMed ID: 33484900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of survival outcomes with or without Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer in China from 2004 to 2016.
Chen C; Duan H; Zhang W; Zhao H; Wang L; Kang S; Lin L; Zhao W; Ni Y; Li D; Chen J; Fan H; Chen X; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1091. PubMed ID: 34627169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feasibility of Laparoscopic Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Horikawa N; Horie A; Kawahara S; Sunada M; Chigusa Y; Yamaguchi K; Hamanishi J; Kondo E; Mandai M
JSLS; 2022; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 35444399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extraperitoneal para-aortic lymph node evaluation for cervical cancer via pfannenstiel incision: technique and peri-operative outcomes.
Moore KN; Gold MA; McMeekin DS; Walker JL; Rutledge T; Zorn KK
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Mar; 108(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 18191994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lymph Node Involvement Pattern and Survival Differences of FIGO IIIC and FIGO IIIA1 Ovarian Cancer Patients After Primary Complete Tumor Debulking Surgery: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis of the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer Network.
Gasimli K; Braicu EI; Nassir M; Richter R; Babayeva A; Chekerov R; Darb-Esfahani S; Sehouli J; Muallem MZ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 23(4):1279-86. PubMed ID: 26832880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal laparoscopic or robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy for staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Pakish J; Soliman PT; Frumovitz M; Westin SN; Schmeler KM; Reis RD; Munsell MF; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 24361579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of primary para-aortic lymphadenectomy on distant failure in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated in the era of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy.
Chargari C; Mazeron R; Dunant A; Gouy S; Petit C; Maroun P; Uzan C; Annede P; Bentivegna E; Balleyguier C; Genestie C; Pautier P; Leary A; Lhomme C; Deutsch E; Morice P; Haie-Meder C
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2016 Dec; 33(8):775-785. PubMed ID: 27530648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Upper margin of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.
Ouldamer L; Fichet-Djavadian S; Marret H; Barillot I; Body G
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):893-900. PubMed ID: 22553934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Debulking during Staging Aortic Lymphadenectomy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Díaz-Feijoó B; Acosta Ú; Torné A; Gil-Ibáñez B; Hernández A; Domingo S; Bradbury M; Gil-Moreno A
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 35454880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes.
Wang R; Tao X; Wu X; Jiang H; Xia H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):946-952. PubMed ID: 31394263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
