These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34218027)

  • 21. The scientific ethos debate: a meta-theoretical view.
    Toren N
    Soc Sci Med; 1983; 17(21):1665-72. PubMed ID: 6648583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rediscovering Tomkins' polarity theory: Humanism, normativism, and the psychological basis of left-right ideological conflict in the U.S. and Sweden.
    Nilsson A; Jost JT
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236627. PubMed ID: 32735591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Typologies of people's preexisting political ideology and values would determine their post-pandemic mental health and political behaviors: Evidence from China.
    Pan S; Xie X; Xu L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1041358. PubMed ID: 36687915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The values and institutional practice of science: Robert Merton's and Thomas Kuhn's conceptions].
    Kropf SP; Lima NT
    Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos; 1998; 5(3):565-81. PubMed ID: 16676448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NASA faked the moon landing--therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science.
    Lewandowsky S; Oberauer K; Gignac GE
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):622-33. PubMed ID: 23531484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle.
    Feinberg M; Wehling E; Chung JM; Saslow LR; Melvær Paulin I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 118(4):777-804. PubMed ID: 31246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.
    Agley J; Xiao Y
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):89. PubMed ID: 33413219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Endorsement of scientific inquiry promotes better evaluation of climate policy evidence.
    Hughes JE; Sauer JD; Drummond A; Brumby LE; Palmer MA
    Clim Change; 2023; 176(6):69. PubMed ID: 37251553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Associations between conspiracism and the rejection of scientific innovations.
    Marques MD; Kerr JR; Williams MN; Ling M; McLennan J
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Oct; 30(7):854-867. PubMed ID: 33860713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection.
    Rutjens BT; Većkalov B
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Aug; 46():101392. PubMed ID: 35797743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Explaining public understanding of the concepts of climate change, nutrition, poverty and effective medical drugs: An international experimental survey.
    Krauss A; Colombo M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234036. PubMed ID: 32520971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Political Orientation and Belief in Science in a U.S. College Sample.
    Medlin MM; Sacco DF; Brown M
    Psychol Rep; 2020 Oct; 123(5):1688-1702. PubMed ID: 31752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority.
    Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychological variables underlying political orientations in an old and a new democracy: A comparative study between Sweden and Latvia.
    Dimdins G; Sandgren M; Montgomery H
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Oct; 57(5):437-45. PubMed ID: 27481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessing what to address in science communication.
    Bruine de Bruin W; Bostrom A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Aug; 110 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):14062-8. PubMed ID: 23942122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence and seepage: An evidence-resistant minority can affect public opinion and scientific belief formation.
    Lewandowsky S; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK; Oreskes N; Risbey JS
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():124-139. PubMed ID: 30686473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Self-serving beliefs about science: Science justifies my weaknesses (but not other people's).
    Cruz F; Mata A
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jul; ():9636625241261320. PubMed ID: 39078125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How Climate Change Science Is Reflected in People's Minds. A Cross-Country Study on People's Perceptions of Climate Change.
    Petrescu-Mag RM; Burny P; Banatean-Dunea I; Petrescu DC
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 35409962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Thought as a determinant of political opinion.
    Sloman SA; Rabb N
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():1-7. PubMed ID: 30853110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.