234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34219311)
1. A systematic evaluation of source reconstruction of resting MEG of the human brain with a new high-resolution atlas: Performance, precision, and parcellation.
Tait L; Özkan A; Szul MJ; Zhang J
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Oct; 42(14):4685-4707. PubMed ID: 34219311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.
James GA; Hazaroglu O; Bush KA
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 26523655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of graph measures derived from resting-state MEG functional connectivity metrics in sensor and source spaces.
Pourmotabbed H; de Jongh Curry AL; Clarke DF; Tyler-Kabara EC; Babajani-Feremi A
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Mar; 43(4):1342-1357. PubMed ID: 35019189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MEG source imaging method using fast L1 minimum-norm and its applications to signals with brain noise and human resting-state source amplitude images.
Huang MX; Huang CW; Robb A; Angeles A; Nichols SL; Baker DG; Song T; Harrington DL; Theilmann RJ; Srinivasan R; Heister D; Diwakar M; Canive JM; Edgar JC; Chen YH; Ji Z; Shen M; El-Gabalawy F; Levy M; McLay R; Webb-Murphy J; Liu TT; Drake A; Lee RR
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():585-604. PubMed ID: 24055704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimising experimental design for MEG resting state functional connectivity measurement.
Liuzzi L; Gascoyne LE; Tewarie PK; Barratt EL; Boto E; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():565-576. PubMed ID: 27903441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple constrained minimum variance beamformer (MCMV) performance in connectivity analyses.
Nunes AS; Moiseev A; Kozhemiako N; Cheung T; Ribary U; Doesburg SM
Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116386. PubMed ID: 31786165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring MEG brain fingerprints: Evaluation, pitfalls, and interpretations.
Sareen E; Zahar S; Ville DV; Gupta A; Griffa A; Amico E
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 240():118331. PubMed ID: 34237444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modified covariance beamformer for solving MEG inverse problem in the environment with correlated sources.
Kuznetsova A; Nurislamova Y; Ossadtchi A
Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117677. PubMed ID: 33385549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying the performance of MEG source reconstruction using resting state data.
Little S; Bonaiuto J; Meyer SS; Lopez J; Bestmann S; Barnes G
Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():453-460. PubMed ID: 30012537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How reliable are MEG resting-state connectivity metrics?
Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Tewarie PK; Brookes MJ; Quinn AJ; Smith SM
Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():284-293. PubMed ID: 27262239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: Identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode.
Maldjian JA; Davenport EM; Whitlow CT
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():88-94. PubMed ID: 24699016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task- and stimulus-related cortical networks in language production: Exploring similarity of MEG- and fMRI-derived functional connectivity.
Liljeström M; Stevenson C; Kujala J; Salmelin R
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():75-87. PubMed ID: 26169324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and elimination of the effects of head movement on MEG resting-state measures of oscillatory brain activity.
Messaritaki E; Koelewijn L; Dima DC; Williams GM; Perry G; Singh KD
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():302-324. PubMed ID: 28735011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy.
Korhonen O; Palva S; Palva JM
J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr; 226():147-160. PubMed ID: 24509129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of Magnetoencephalography and High-Density Electroencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity Metrics.
Marquetand J; Vannoni S; Carboni M; Li Hegner Y; Stier C; Braun C; Focke NK
Brain Connect; 2019 Sep; 9(7):539-553. PubMed ID: 31115272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tracking dynamic brain networks using high temporal resolution MEG measures of functional connectivity.
Tewarie P; Liuzzi L; O'Neill GC; Quinn AJ; Griffa A; Woolrich MW; Stam CJ; Hillebrand A; Brookes MJ
Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 200():38-50. PubMed ID: 31207339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the spatial resolution of source imaging techniques in high-density EEG and MEG.
Hedrich T; Pellegrino G; Kobayashi E; Lina JM; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 157():531-544. PubMed ID: 28619655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
