These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34219839)

  • 21. Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.
    Ross ZE; Idini B; Jia Z; Stephenson OL; Zhong M; Wang X; Zhan Z; Simons M; Fielding EJ; Yun SH; Hauksson E; Moore AW; Liu Z; Jung J
    Science; 2019 Oct; 366(6463):346-351. PubMed ID: 31624209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Searching for hidden earthquakes in Southern California.
    Ross ZE; Trugman DT; Hauksson E; Shearer PM
    Science; 2019 May; 364(6442):767-771. PubMed ID: 31000593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake.
    Kato A; Obara K; Igarashi T; Tsuruoka H; Nakagawa S; Hirata N
    Science; 2012 Feb; 335(6069):705-8. PubMed ID: 22267578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence.
    Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y
    Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake.
    Schurr B; Asch G; Hainzl S; Bedford J; Hoechner A; Palo M; Wang R; Moreno M; Bartsch M; Zhang Y; Oncken O; Tilmann F; Dahm T; Victor P; Barrientos S; Vilotte JP
    Nature; 2014 Aug; 512(7514):299-302. PubMed ID: 25119049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences.
    Saichev A; Sornette D
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046123. PubMed ID: 15600476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence.
    Yagi Y; Okuwaki R; Enescu B; Lu J
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36670137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Premonitory patterns of seismicity months before a large earthquake: five case histories in Southern California.
    Keilis-Borok VI; Shebalin PN; Zaliapin IV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Dec; 99(26):16562-7. PubMed ID: 12482945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spatiotemporal Variations of the Frequency-Magnitude Distribution in the 2019
    Sardeli E; Michas G; Pavlou K; Vallianatos F
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Dec; 25(12):. PubMed ID: 38136492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-segment rupture of the 2016 Amatrice-Visso-Norcia seismic sequence (central Italy) constrained by the first high-quality catalog of Early Aftershocks.
    Improta L; Latorre D; Margheriti L; Nardi A; Marchetti A; Lombardi AM; Castello B; Villani F; Ciaccio MG; Mele FM; Moretti M;
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):6921. PubMed ID: 31061514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A laboratory perspective on accelerating preparatory processes before earthquakes and implications for foreshock detectability.
    Goebel THW; Schuster V; Kwiatek G; Pandey K; Dresen G
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jul; 15(1):5588. PubMed ID: 38961092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Frequency-Magnitude Statistics of Laboratory Foreshocks Vary With Shear Velocity, Fault Slip Rate, and Shear Stress.
    Bolton DC; Shreedharan S; Rivière J; Marone C
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2021 Nov; 126(11):e2021JB022175. PubMed ID: 35865108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Remote triggering of deep earthquakes in the 2002 Tonga sequences.
    Tibi R; Wiens DA; Inoue H
    Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):921-5. PubMed ID: 12931183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abnormal low-magnitude seismicity preceding large-magnitude earthquakes.
    Girona T; Drymoni K
    Nat Commun; 2024 Aug; 15(1):7429. PubMed ID: 39198420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On catching the preparatory phase of damaging earthquakes: an example from central Italy.
    Picozzi M; Iaccarino AG; Spallarossa D; Bindi D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Sep; 13(1):14403. PubMed ID: 37658128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Foreshock properties illuminate nucleation processes of slow and fast laboratory earthquakes.
    Bolton DC; Marone C; Saffer D; Trugman DT
    Nat Commun; 2023 Jun; 14(1):3859. PubMed ID: 37386022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in california.
    Reasenberg PA; Jones LM
    Science; 1989 Mar; 243(4895):1173-6. PubMed ID: 17799897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship of preseismic, coseismic, and postseismic fault ruptures of two large interplate aftershocks of the 2011 Tohoku earthquake with slow-earthquake activity.
    Kubo H; Nishikawa T
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12044. PubMed ID: 32694554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Going Beyond Rate Changes as the Sole Indicator for Dynamic Triggering of Earthquakes.
    Pankow KL; Kilb D
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4120. PubMed ID: 32139750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks.
    Gulia L; Wiemer S
    Nature; 2019 Oct; 574(7777):193-199. PubMed ID: 31597971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.