198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34220381)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of
Kim SJ; Lee SW; Pak K; Kim IJ; Kim K
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 91(1086):20170520. PubMed ID: 29327944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for characterization of colorectal focal FDG uptake: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Son GM; Kim SJ
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):456-463. PubMed ID: 30132094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1703-1711. PubMed ID: 30603881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Staging/restaging performance of F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: A review and meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lin CL; Kao CH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():158-165. PubMed ID: 30292261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic Value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Local Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of 26 Individual Studies.
Yu T; Meng N; Chi D; Zhao Y; Wang K; Luo Y
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2015 Jun; 72(2):443-51. PubMed ID: 25737131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET for evaluation of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Liu B; Xu Z; Bao L; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):615-27. PubMed ID: 22734080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic test accuracies of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Kim K; Kim SJ
Clin Imaging; 2021 Nov; 79():251-258. PubMed ID: 34157501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The utility of
Zhang Q; Xi Y; Li D; Yuan Z; Dong J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 32571371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diagnostic performance of
Ko WS; Kim SJ
Hell J Nucl Med; 2023; 26(2):132-139. PubMed ID: 37527049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can
Du B; Wang S; Cui Y; Liu G; Li X; Li Y
BMJ Open; 2021 Jun; 11(6):e044313. PubMed ID: 34103313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Assessment of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ
Oncology; 2021; 99(2):96-104. PubMed ID: 32980838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT with bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis: a meta-analysis.
Cheng X; Li Y; Xu Z; Bao L; Li D; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):779-87. PubMed ID: 21712464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracies of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Spondylodiscitis: A Meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K; Lee JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):E414-E422. PubMed ID: 30889146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Seol HY; Kim YS; Kim SJ
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Nov; 11(11):3260-3268. PubMed ID: 32951338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy for the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with lung cancer: which one is the best?--a meta-analysis.
Liu T; Xu JY; Xu W; Bai YR; Yan WL; Yang HL
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2011 Jun; 23(5):350-8. PubMed ID: 21094027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnostic performance of
Treglia G; Pascale M; Lazzeri E; van der Bruggen W; Delgado Bolton RC; Glaudemans AWJM
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 May; 47(5):1287-1301. PubMed ID: 31729539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37.
Li H; Xu C; Xin B; Zheng C; Zhao Y; Hao K; Wang Q; Wahl RL; Wang X; Zhou Y
Theranostics; 2019; 9(16):4730-4739. PubMed ID: 31367253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yin Y; Liu X; Yang X; Guo J; Wang Q; Chen L
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2323-2332. PubMed ID: 30121323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Whole-Body
Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus CV; Fragomeni RS; Rowe SP; Javadi MS; Solnes LB
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1031-1036. PubMed ID: 27980049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. FDG PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Adams HJ; Kwee TC; de Keizer B; Fijnheer R; de Klerk JM; Nievelstein RA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2014 Mar; 41(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 24281821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
