BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34220738)

  • 1. Beating Naive Bayes at Taxonomic Classification of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences.
    Ziemski M; Wisanwanichthan T; Bokulich NA; Kaehler BD
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():644487. PubMed ID: 34220738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construction & assessment of a unified curated reference database for improving the taxonomic classification of bacteria using 16S rRNA sequence data.
    Agnihotry S; Sarangi AN; Aggarwal R
    Indian J Med Res; 2020 Jan; 151(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 32134020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin.
    Bokulich NA; Kaehler BD; Rideout JR; Dillon M; Bolyen E; Knight R; Huttley GA; Gregory Caporaso J
    Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):90. PubMed ID: 29773078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy.
    Gao X; Lin H; Revanna K; Dong Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):247. PubMed ID: 28486927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NBC: the Naive Bayes Classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads.
    Rosen GL; Reichenberger ER; Rosenfeld AM
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 27(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 21062764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deep learning models for bacteria taxonomic classification of metagenomic data.
    Fiannaca A; La Paglia L; La Rosa M; Lo Bosco G; Renda G; Rizzo R; Gaglio S; Urso A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 19(Suppl 7):198. PubMed ID: 30066629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 16S classifier: a tool for fast and accurate taxonomic classification of 16S rRNA hypervariable regions in metagenomic datasets.
    Chaudhary N; Sharma AK; Agarwal P; Gupta A; Sharma VK
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116106. PubMed ID: 25646627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A k-mer-based barcode DNA classification methodology based on spectral representation and a neural gas network.
    Fiannaca A; La Rosa M; Rizzo R; Urso A
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Jul; 64(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 26170017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of 16S and whole genome dog microbiomes using machine learning.
    Lewis S; Nash A; Li Q; Ahn TH
    BioData Min; 2021 Aug; 14(1):41. PubMed ID: 34419136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Targeting Non-Contiguous V-Regions With Paired-End Sequencing Improve 16S rRNA-Based Taxonomic Resolution of Microbiomes?: An
    Pinna NK; Dutta A; Monzoorul Haque M; Mande SS
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():653. PubMed ID: 31354793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CNN_FunBar: Advanced Learning Technique for Fungi ITS Region Classification.
    Das R; Rai A; Mishra DC
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Mar; 14(3):. PubMed ID: 36980906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. TaxAss: Leveraging a Custom Freshwater Database Achieves Fine-Scale Taxonomic Resolution.
    Rohwer RR; Hamilton JJ; Newton RJ; McMahon KD
    mSphere; 2018 Sep; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 30185512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing K-mer based methods for improved classification of 16S sequences.
    Vinje H; Liland KH; Almøy T; Snipen L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 16():205. PubMed ID: 26130333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of transitive annotation on the training of taxonomic classifiers.
    Muralidharan HS; Fox NY; Pop M
    Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1240957. PubMed ID: 38235435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing taxonomic classification using extensible Markov models.
    Kotamarti RM; Hahsler M; Raiford D; McGee M; Dunham MH
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Sep; 26(18):2235-41. PubMed ID: 20624777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of statistical methods to classify environmental genomic fragments.
    Rosen GL; Essinger SD
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2010 Dec; 9(4):310-6. PubMed ID: 20876033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 16S rRNA sequence embeddings: Meaningful numeric feature representations of nucleotide sequences that are convenient for downstream analyses.
    Woloszynek S; Zhao Z; Chen J; Rosen GL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Feb; 15(2):e1006721. PubMed ID: 30807567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. C16S - a Hidden Markov Model based algorithm for taxonomic classification of 16S rRNA gene sequences.
    Ghosh TS; Gajjalla P; Mohammed MH; Mande SS
    Genomics; 2012 Apr; 99(4):195-201. PubMed ID: 22326741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Species abundance information improves sequence taxonomy classification accuracy.
    Kaehler BD; Bokulich NA; McDonald D; Knight R; Caporaso JG; Huttley GA
    Nat Commun; 2019 Oct; 10(1):4643. PubMed ID: 31604942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IPED: a highly efficient denoising tool for Illumina MiSeq Paired-end 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data.
    Mysara M; Leys N; Raes J; Monsieurs P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17(1):192. PubMed ID: 27130479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.