These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34221213)
1. Bias Evaluation of the Accuracy of Two Extraoral Scanners and an Intraoral Scanner Based on ADA Standards. Cui N; Wang J; Hou X; Sun S; Huang Q; Lim HK; Cai H; Jia Q; Lee ES; Jiang HB Scanning; 2021; 2021():5535403. PubMed ID: 34221213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans. Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study. Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis. Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of International Standard Spherical Model by Digital Dental Scanners. Cai HX; Jia Q; Shi H; Jiang Y; Xue J; Chen C; Gong H; Liu J; Lee ES; Jiang HB Scanning; 2020; 2020():1714642. PubMed ID: 33500743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner. Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Jiménez-Martínez MJ; Revilla-León M J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 32665118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design of a Single-Tooth Model and Its Application in Oral Scan System Assessment. Cai H; Zhao BC; Tian Y; Kim DH; Sun Y; Lim HK; Lee ES; Jiang HB Scanning; 2021; 2021():8891396. PubMed ID: 33824693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans. Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the acquisition accuracy and digitizing noise of 9 intraoral and extraoral scanners: An objective method. Dupagne L; Tapie L; Lebon N; Mawussi B J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1032-1040. PubMed ID: 33781577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner - an in vitro study. Joós-Kovács G; Vecsei B; Körmendi S; Gyarmathy VA; Borbély J; Hermann P BMC Oral Health; 2019 Dec; 19(1):280. PubMed ID: 31830970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study. Alzahrani SJ; El-Hammali H; Morgano SM; Elkassaby H J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Dec; 126(6):787-792. PubMed ID: 33172647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the effect of different core substrates on the accuracy of intraoral scanners. Khoshkhahesh M; Enteghad S; Aghasadeghi K; Farzin M; Taghva M; Mosadad SA Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e899. PubMed ID: 38752461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study. Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners. Amornvit P; Rokaya D; Sanohkan S Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():2673040. PubMed ID: 34552983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices. Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. Fukazawa S; Odaira C; Kondo H J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Oct; 61(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 28216020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]