These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34221423)

  • 1. Freedom of thought in Europe: do advances in 'brain-reading' technology call for revision?
    Ligthart S
    J Law Biosci; 2020; 7(1):lsaa048. PubMed ID: 34221423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges.
    Ligthart S; Douglas T; Bublitz C; Kooijmans T; Meynen G
    Neuroethics; 2021 Jul; 14():191-203. PubMed ID: 35186162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coercive neuroimaging, criminal law, and privacy: a European perspective.
    Ligthart SLTJ
    J Law Biosci; 2019 Oct; 6(1):289-309. PubMed ID: 31666970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Right to Construct Yourself and Your Identity: The Current Human Rights Law Framework Falls Short in Practice in the Face of Illegitimate Interference to the Mind.
    Yildirim-Vranckaert EO
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Jul; 49(2-3):267-285. PubMed ID: 38344788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century.
    McCarthy-Jones S
    Front Artif Intell; 2019; 2():19. PubMed ID: 33733108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying Criteria for the Evaluation of the Implications of Brain Reading for Mental Privacy.
    Mecacci G; Haselager P
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):443-461. PubMed ID: 29247306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should violent offenders be forced to undergo neurotechnological treatment? A critical discussion of the 'freedom of thought' objection.
    Petersen TS; Kragh K
    J Med Ethics; 2017 Jan; 43(1):30-34. PubMed ID: 27845682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating Brain Science and Law: Neuroscientific Evidence and Legal Perspectives on Protecting Individual Liberties.
    Kraft CJ; Giordano J
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():621. PubMed ID: 29167633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted suicide under the European Convention on Human Rights: a critique.
    Morris D
    Eur Hum Rights Law Rev; 2003; (1):65-91. PubMed ID: 15199936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective.
    Tortora L; Meynen G; Bijlsma J; Tronci E; Ferracuti S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():220. PubMed ID: 32256422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The tension between cross-border cooperation in the European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and the fundamental rights of mentally ill offenders in detention.
    Meysman M
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():136-47. PubMed ID: 27161798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology.
    Ienca M; Andorno R
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2017 Dec; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 28444626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex workers, unite! (Litigating for sex workers' freedom of association in Russia).
    Arps FS; Golichenko M
    Health Hum Rights; 2014 Dec; 16(2):E24-34. PubMed ID: 25569722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychedelics and cognitive liberty: Reimagining drug policy through the prism of human rights.
    Walsh C
    Int J Drug Policy; 2016 Mar; 29():80-7. PubMed ID: 26838469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fear of communicating fear versus fear of terrorism: A human rights violation or a sign of our time?
    Anyanwu C
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 29316824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Persuasive Technology and computational manipulation: hypernudging out of mental self-determination.
    Faraoni S
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1216340. PubMed ID: 37469930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
    Czerner F
    Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Well-being Conception of Health and the Conflation Problem.
    de Campos TC
    New Bioeth; 2016 Apr; 22(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 28219285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The personal information sphere: An integral approach to privacy and related information and communication rights.
    Eskens S
    J Assoc Inf Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 71(9):1116-1128. PubMed ID: 32984437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.