221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34222482)
1. Effects of Exposure Parameters and Voxel Size for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on the Image Matching Accuracy with an Optical Dental Scan Image: An In Vitro Study.
Mai HN; Lee DH
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6971828. PubMed ID: 34222482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Matching Point Selections on Image Registration Accuracy between Optical Scan and Computed Tomography.
Mai HY; Lee DH
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():3285431. PubMed ID: 32802841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro.
Sur J; Seki K; Koizumi H; Nakajima K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Sep; 110(3):e29-33. PubMed ID: 20598589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of voxel size and scan time on the accuracy of three-dimensional radiological imaging data from cone-beam computed tomography.
Dach E; Bergauer B; Seidel A; von Wilmowsky C; Adler W; Lell M; Wichmann M; Matta RE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2190-2196. PubMed ID: 30318325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of voxel size and resolution on the accuracy of endodontic length measurement using cone beam computed tomography.
Aktan AM; Yildirim C; Karataşlıoğlu E; Çiftçi ME; Aksoy F
Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():96-102. PubMed ID: 27339301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cone-beam computed tomography triple scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model appropriate for orthognathic surgery planning.
Swennen GR; Mollemans W; De Clercq C; Abeloos J; Lamoral P; Lippens F; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 19276829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography.
Hassan B; Couto Souza P; Jacobs R; de Azambuja Berti S; van der Stelt P
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Jun; 14(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 19506922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography.
Hatcher DC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Oct; 141 Suppl 3():3S-6S. PubMed ID: 20884933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dimensional measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional models from cone beam computed tomography using different voxel sizes.
Mukhia N; Birur NP; Shubhasini AR; Shubha G; Keerthi G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Sep; 132(3):361-369. PubMed ID: 34246615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic image-to-world registration based on x-ray projections in cone-beam CT-guided interventions.
Hamming NM; Daly MJ; Irish JC; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1800-12. PubMed ID: 19544799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
