These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34223257)

  • 1. Cross-sectional analysis of online patient reviews of infertility care providers.
    Allen R; Agarwal S; Trolice MP
    F S Rep; 2020 Dec; 1(3):282-286. PubMed ID: 34223257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online reviews of orthopedic surgeons: an emerging trend.
    Frost C; Mesfin A
    Orthopedics; 2015 Apr; 38(4):e257-62. PubMed ID: 25901617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology.
    Basa K; Jabbour N; Rohlfing M; Schmoker S; Lawlor CM; Levi J; Sobin L; Tracy JC; Tracy LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Dec; 130(12):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33813874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding Your Online Ratings: A Methodological Analysis Using Urogynecologists in the United States.
    Huber SA; Priestley J; Kasabwala K; Gadidov B; Culligan P
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):193-197. PubMed ID: 30807427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of sentiment and word frequency analysis of physician review sites to evaluate refractive surgery care.
    Vought V; Vought R; Lee AS; Zhou I; Garneni M; Greenstein SA
    Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res; 2024; 4(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 38590556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].
    Meszmer N; Jaegers L; Schöffski O; Emmert M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Apr; 131-132():73-80. PubMed ID: 29331281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
    Sobin L; Goyal P
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital Footprint of Academic Vascular Surgeons in the Southern United States on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-sectional Evaluation Study.
    Yan Q; Jensen KJ; Thomas R; Field AR; Jiang Z; Goei C; Davies MG
    JMIR Cardio; 2021 Feb; 5(1):e22975. PubMed ID: 33625359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Negative Online Ratings of Joint Replacement Surgeons: An Analysis of 6,402 Reviews.
    Imbergamo C; Brzezinski A; Patankar A; Weintraub M; Mazzaferro N; Kayiaros S
    Arthroplast Today; 2021 Jun; 9():106-111. PubMed ID: 34189214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data Accuracy and Predictors of High Ratings of Colon and Rectal Surgeons on an Online Physician Rating Website.
    Hill SS; Hoang CM; Cheraghi SN; Shabo MR; Resnick AJ; Crawford A; Melnitchouk N; Harnsberger CR; Alavi K; Sturrock PR; Maykel JA; Davids JS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Feb; 63(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31914115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty.
    Wanken ZJ; Rode JB; Bessen SY; Anderson PB; Barnes JA; Eid MA; Goodney PP
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2021 Jan; 70():27-35. PubMed ID: 32442595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of Patient Sentiment Analysis to Evaluate Glaucoma Care.
    Vought V; Vought R; Herzog A; Habiel MM
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2024; 7(3):316-322. PubMed ID: 38103732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online Ratings of Spine Surgeons: Analysis of 208 Surgeons.
    Zhang J; Omar A; Mesfin A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jun; 43(12):E722-E726. PubMed ID: 29846366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. State-mandated insurance coverage is associated with the approach to hydrosalpinges before IVF.
    Omurtag K; Grindler NM; Roehl KA; Bates GW; Beltsos AN; Odem RR; Jungheim ES
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):131-5. PubMed ID: 24813751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Online Physician Ratings and Internal Patient-Submitted Ratings from a Large Healthcare System.
    Okike K; Uhr NR; Shin SYM; Xie KC; Kim CY; Funahashi TT; Kanter MH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2575-2579. PubMed ID: 31531811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.