149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34224471)
1. Multiple-bias Sensitivity Analysis Using Bounds.
Smith LH; Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):625-634. PubMed ID: 34224471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 31033690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning.
Fox MP; Lash TL
Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 43():32-36. PubMed ID: 32113733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bounding formulas for selection bias.
Huang TH; Lee WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 182(10):868-72. PubMed ID: 26519426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SAS and R code for probabilistic quantitative bias analysis for misclassified binary variables and binary unmeasured confounders.
Fox MP; MacLehose RF; Lash TL
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Oct; 52(5):1624-1633. PubMed ID: 37141446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Definitions of Bias in Clinical Research.
Warden G
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():35-52. PubMed ID: 33871837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limits for the Magnitude of M-bias and Certain Other Types of Structural Selection Bias.
Flanders WD; Ye D
Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):501-508. PubMed ID: 31033689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approaches to addressing missing values, measurement error, and confounding in epidemiologic studies.
van Smeden M; Penning de Vries BBL; Nab L; Groenwold RHH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 131():89-100. PubMed ID: 33176189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Brief Report: Negative Controls to Detect Selection Bias and Measurement Bias in Epidemiologic Studies.
Arnold BF; Ercumen A; Benjamin-Chung J; Colford JM
Epidemiology; 2016 Sep; 27(5):637-41. PubMed ID: 27182642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nonparametric Bounds for the Risk Function.
Cole SR; Hudgens MG; Edwards JK; Brookhart MA; Richardson DB; Westreich D; Adimora AA
Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 188(4):632-636. PubMed ID: 30698633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Importance of Making Assumptions in Bias Analysis.
MacLehose RF; Ahern TP; Lash TL; Poole C; Greenland S
Epidemiology; 2021 Sep; 32(5):617-624. PubMed ID: 34224472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bias in Clinical Research.
Stuckless S; Parfrey PS
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():17-34. PubMed ID: 33871836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.
Haneuse S
Med Care; 2016 Apr; 54(4):e23-9. PubMed ID: 24309675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and the risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A causal association or bias?
Masarwa R; Platt RW; Filion KB
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 May; 34(3):309-317. PubMed ID: 31916282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
