135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34225313)
1. A Systematic Review Comparing Outcomes of Local Flap Options for Reconstruction of Pressure Sores.
Vathulya M; Praveen AJ; Barik S; Jagtap MP; Kandwal P
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jan; 88(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 34225313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of outcomes of pressure sore reconstructions among perforator flaps, perforator-based rotation fasciocutaneous flaps, and musculocutaneous flaps.
Kuo PJ; Chew KY; Kuo YR; Lin PY
Microsurgery; 2014 Oct; 34(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 24706528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of complication and recurrence rates of musculocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, and perforator-based flaps for treatment of pressure sores.
Sameem M; Au M; Wood T; Farrokhyar F; Mahoney J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jul; 130(1):67e-77e. PubMed ID: 22743956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of gluteal perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flaps for reconstruction of sacral pressure sores.
Chen YC; Huang EY; Lin PY
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Mar; 67(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 24476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective study: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the outcomes after pressure sores reconstruction with fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, and perforator flaps.
Chiu YJ; Liao WC; Wang TH; Shih YC; Ma H; Lin CH; Wu SH; Perng CK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1038-1043. PubMed ID: 28552279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of Perforator-Based Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Pressure Sore Reconstruction: Single-Perforator-Based Versus Multiple-Perforator-Based Flaps.
Chih-Hsun L; Ma H
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 27302416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new flap alternative for trochanteric pressure sore coverage: distal gluteus maximus musculocutaneous advancement flap.
Nisanci M; Sahin I; Eski M; Alhan D
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Feb; 74(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 24051465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clover-Style Fasciocutaneous Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Massive Sacral Pressure Sores.
Cheng J; Zhang Q; Feng S; Wu X; Huo W; Ma Y; Cai J; Liu M
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jan; 86(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 32487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified lumbar artery perforator flaps for gluteal pressure sore reconstruction.
Yoon CS; Yim JH; Kim MH; Ha W; Kim KN
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Dec; 87(12):1035-1039. PubMed ID: 26999425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reusable perforator-preserving gluteal artery-based rotation fasciocutaneous flap for pressure sore reconstruction.
Lin PY; Kuo YR; Tsai YT
Microsurgery; 2012 Mar; 32(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 22262635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tensor fascia lata flap versus tensor fascia lata perforator-based island flap for the coverage of extensive trochanteric pressure sores.
Kim YH; Kim SW; Kim JT; Kim CY
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jun; 70(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 23392259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of inferior gluteal artery and posterior thigh perforators in management of ischial pressure sores with limited donor sites for flap coverage.
Unal C; Ozdemir J; Yirmibesoglu O; Yucel E; Agir H
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 21629051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perforator-based fasciocutaneous flap for pressure sore reconstruction.
Lin CH; Ma H
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2012 Dec; 46(6):430-3. PubMed ID: 23157504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parasacral Perforator Flaps for Reconstruction of Sacral Pressure Sores.
Lin CT; Chen SY; Chen SG; Tzeng YS; Chang SC
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jul; 75(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 26068420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of fasciocutaneous V-Y and rotational flaps for defect coverage of sacral pressure sores: a critical single-centre appraisal.
Djedovic G; Metzler J; Morandi EM; Wachter T; Kühn S; Pierer G; Rieger UM
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):945-949. PubMed ID: 28261939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gluteal perforator flaps for coverage of pressure sores at various locations.
Coşkunfirat OK; Ozgentaş HE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):2012-7; discussion 2018-9. PubMed ID: 15253191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Pacman Perforator-Based V-Y Advancement Flap for Reconstruction of Pressure Sores at Different Locations.
Bonomi S; Salval A; Brenta F; Rapisarda V; Settembrini F
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Sep; 77(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 26418776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The pedicled internal pudendal artery perforator (PIPAP) flap for ischial pressure sore reconstruction: Technique and long-term outcome of a cohort study.
Legemate CM; van der Kwaak M; Gobets D; Huikeshoven M; van Zuijlen PPM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jun; 71(6):889-894. PubMed ID: 29428586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of recurrent ischial pressure sore with gracilis muscle flap and V-Y profunda femoris artery perforator-based flap.
Lee SS; Huang SH; Chen MC; Chang KP; Lai CS; Lin SD
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1339-46. PubMed ID: 18595789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Planning a Pedicled Perforator Flap for Pressure Sores in the Gluteal Region.
Park SJ; Lee KT; Jeon BJ; Woo KJ
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2018 Jun; 17(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 29701113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
