BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

606 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34226106)

  • 1. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis (SAVR): A Cost-Comparison Study.
    Shah KK; Elder D; Nguyen MTH; Turner L; Doyle M; Woldendorp K; Seco M; Law CK; Wilson MK; Keech A; Ng MK; Morton RL
    Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Dec; 30(12):1918-1928. PubMed ID: 34226106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes of heart-team-guided treatment decisions in high-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis in a health-economic context with limited resources for transcatheter valve therapies.
    Bakelants E; Belmans A; Verbrugghe P; Adriaenssens T; Jacobs S; Bennett J; Meuris B; Desmet W; Rega F; Herijgers P; Herregods MC; Dubois CL
    Acta Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 74(6):489-498. PubMed ID: 30507297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients.
    Piazza N; Kalesan B; van Mieghem N; Head S; Wenaweser P; Carrel TP; Bleiziffer S; de Jaegere PP; Gahl B; Anderson RH; Kappetein AP; Lange R; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Jüni P
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 6(5):443-51. PubMed ID: 23702009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in the intermediate surgical risk population.
    Zhou J; Liew D; Duffy SJ; Walton A; Htun N; Stub D
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 294():17-22. PubMed ID: 31255453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(2):1-121. PubMed ID: 32194880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Zhou JY; Liew D; Duffy SJ; Walton A; Htun N; Stub D
    Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Apr; 30(4):547-554. PubMed ID: 33189571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Swift SL; Puehler T; Misso K; Lang SH; Forbes C; Kleijnen J; Danner M; Kuhn C; Haneya A; Seoudy H; Cremer J; Frey N; Lutter G; Wolff R; Scheibler F; Wehkamp K; Frank D
    BMJ Open; 2021 Dec; 11(12):e054222. PubMed ID: 34873012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.
    Abdul-Jawad Altisent O; Ferreira-Gonzalez I; Marsal JR; Ribera A; Auger C; Ortega G; Cascant P; Urena M; Del Blanco BG; Serra V; Sureda C; Igual A; Rovira A; González-Alujas MT; Gonzalez A; Puri R; Cuellar H; Tornos P; Rodés-Cabau J; Garcia-Dorado D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 105(6):508-17. PubMed ID: 26646556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.
    Tarantini G; Nai Fovino L; D'Errigo P; Rosato S; Barbanti M; Tamburino C; Ranucci M; Santoro G; Badoni G; Seccareccia F;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 95(6):E186-E195. PubMed ID: 31423704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(14):1-148. PubMed ID: 33240455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparison of the clinical outcomes and costs between surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database.
    Yunoki J; Morita S; Hayashi N; Jinnouchi K; Morokuma H; Itoh M; Kamohara K
    Surg Today; 2024 Mar; 54(3):240-246. PubMed ID: 37395799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ongoing requirement for pacing post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.
    Simms AD; Hogarth AJ; Hudson EA; Worsnop VL; Blackman DJ; O'Regan DJ; Tayebjee MH
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Aug; 17(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 23620339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Taiwan: A population-based cohort study.
    Chung CH; Wang YJ; Jiao X; Lee CY
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285191. PubMed ID: 37134111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score matched comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus conventional surgery in intermediate and low risk aortic stenosis patients: A hint of real-world.
    Castrodeza J; Amat-Santos IJ; Blanco M; Cortes C; Tobar J; Martin-Morquecho I; López J; Di Stefano S; Rojas P; Varela-Falcon LH; Gomez I; San Roman JA
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(5):541-551. PubMed ID: 27439368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement among hospitalized patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus in Spain (2014-2015).
    Mendez-Bailon M; Lorenzo-Villalba N; Muñoz-Rivas N; de Miguel-Yanes JM; De Miguel-Diez J; Comín-Colet J; Hernandez-Barrera V; Jimenez-Garcia R; Lopez-de-Andres A
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2017 Nov; 16(1):144. PubMed ID: 29121921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].
    Ye YQ; Wang YT; Li Z; Wang MY; Xu HY; Zhang WJ; Liu QR; Niu GN; Wu YJ
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Jan; 45(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 28100340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: in-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).
    Bekeredjian R; Szabo G; Balaban Ü; Bleiziffer S; Bauer T; Ensminger S; Frerker C; Herrmann E; Beyersdorf F; Hamm C; Beckmann A; Möllmann H; Karck M; Katus HA; Walther T
    Eur Heart J; 2019 May; 40(17):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30445543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Vs Surgical Replacement of Failing Stented Aortic Biological Valves.
    Sedeek AF; Greason KL; Sandhu GS; Dearani JA; Holmes DR; Schaff HV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Aug; 108(2):424-430. PubMed ID: 31055036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early and Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Bioprosthetic Valve Degeneration: Two Faces of the Same Medal.
    Dokollari A; Cameli M; Mandoli GE; Kalra DS; Poston R; Coku L; Pernoci M; Miri M; Bonacchi M; Gelsomino S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Nov; 35(11):3223-3231. PubMed ID: 34175205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in aortic stenosis patients at low- and intermediate-surgical risk in Japan.
    Kobayashi J; Baron SJ; Takagi K; Thompson CA; Jiao X; Yamabe K
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):697-707. PubMed ID: 38654415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.