These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3422707)

  • 1. Royalties to be paid on animal patents.
    Ezzell C
    Nature; 1988 Feb; 331(6158):651. PubMed ID: 3422707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congress to weigh animal patents.
    Crawford M
    Science; 1987 May; 236(4805):1058. PubMed ID: 3472349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal patent dispute out in the open at congressional hearings.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1987 Jun 18-24; 327(6123):546. PubMed ID: 3474523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human or animal: a resolution to the biotechnological blurring of the lines.
    Cirlin L
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 2003; 32(3):501-25. PubMed ID: 15212023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patents for genetically modified animals.
    O'Connor KW
    J Anim Sci; 1993; 71 Suppl 3():34-40. PubMed ID: 8505268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The human chimera patent initiative.
    Newman SA
    Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2002; 9(1):4, 7. PubMed ID: 15584183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European Commission rethinks biotech patents.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Dec; 20(12):1175-6. PubMed ID: 12454654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biotechnology. EC look to animal patents.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1991 Sep; 353(6339):8. PubMed ID: 1881451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A nail in the coffin for DNA sequence patents?
    Yamanaka M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1085-6. PubMed ID: 18846072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Harvard squeaks through oncomouse patent appeal.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6861):241. PubMed ID: 11713493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intellectual property in higher life forms: the patent system and controversial technologies.
    Merges RP
    MD Law Rev; 1988; 47(4):1051-75. PubMed ID: 16514761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Supreme Court and patenting life.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Oct; 10(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 6934170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. EPO patient dispute: court battle ends at the start.
    Gershon D
    Nature; 1989 Dec 21-28; 342(6252):846. PubMed ID: 2594071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New battle over TPA.
    Ezzell C
    Nature; 1989 Aug; 340(6233):418. PubMed ID: 2502715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The level of disclosure necessary for patent protection of genetic innovations.
    Berman RJ; El Schoenhard A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Oct; 22(10):1307-8. PubMed ID: 15470468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Europe says no to animal patents.
    Dickson D
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4913):25. PubMed ID: 2740910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US court case to define EST patentability.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):513. PubMed ID: 15877055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foreword: what hath (not) Chakrabarty wrought: from the mouse that roared to Hello Dolly and beyond.
    Yonover GJ
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1998; 32(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 12710435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ownership at too high a price?
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):953. PubMed ID: 12949537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. From Chakrabarty to chimeras: the growing need for evolutionary biology in patent law.
    Iwasaka RM
    Yale Law J; 2000 Apr; 109(6):1505-34. PubMed ID: 11010631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.