BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34227169)

  • 21. Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection After a Negative Prebiopsy MRI Examination: Comparison of Biparametric Versus Multiparametric MRI.
    Gan JM; Kikano EG; Smith DA; Rao S; Podury R; Wang M; Durieux JC; Paspulati RM; Ponsky L; Ramaiya NH; Tirumani SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):859-866. PubMed ID: 34817189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A predictive model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters for improved risk assessment and selection of biopsy-naïve men for prostate biopsies.
    Boesen L; Thomsen FB; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thomsen HS; Jakobsen H
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 Dec; 22(4):609-616. PubMed ID: 30988407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.
    Chen T; Zhang Z; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Wang S; Zhao W; Qian X; Zhou Z; Shen J; Dai Y; Hu J
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():792456. PubMed ID: 35127499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development and validation of a nomogram based on biparametric MRI PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical parameters to avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies.
    Wang Y; Wang L; Tang X; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Zhi B; Niu X
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Aug; 23(1):106. PubMed ID: 37582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modified Predictive Model and Nomogram by Incorporating Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Clinical Indicators for Prostate Biopsy Decision Making.
    Pan JF; Su R; Cao JZ; Zhao ZY; Ren DW; Ye SZ; Huang RD; Tao ZL; Yu CL; Jiang JH; Ma Q
    Front Oncol; 2021; 11():740868. PubMed ID: 34589437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
    Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients.
    Hu B; Zhang H; Zhang Y; Jin Y
    Cancer Imaging; 2023 Sep; 23(1):82. PubMed ID: 37667393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics for the identification of benign and malignant prostate lesions: cross-vendor validation.
    Ji X; Zhang J; Shi W; He D; Bao J; Wei X; Huang Y; Liu Y; Chen JC; Gao X; Tang Y; Xia W
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2021 Sep; 44(3):745-754. PubMed ID: 34075559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Combined Use of Prostate-specific Antigen Density and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Biopsy Decision Planning: A Retrospective Multi-institutional Study Using the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Outcome Database (PROMOD).
    Falagario UG; Jambor I; Lantz A; Ettala O; Stabile A; Taimen P; Aronen HJ; Knaapila J; Perez IM; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Martini A; Cucchiara V; Picker W; Haug E; Ratnani P; Haines K; Lewis S; Sujit N; Selvaggio O; Sanguedolce F; Macarini L; Cormio L; Nordström T; Tewari A; Briganti A; Boström PJ; Carrieri G
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):971-979. PubMed ID: 32972896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiomics Models Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps for the Prediction of High-Grade Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison With Preoperative Biopsy.
    Han C; Ma S; Liu X; Liu Y; Li C; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Wang X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Dec; 54(6):1892-1901. PubMed ID: 33682286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.
    Knaapila J; Autio V; Jambor I; Ettala O; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Taimen P; Perez IM; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
    Scand J Urol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 31914846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiomic features from pretreatment biparametric MRI predict prostate cancer biochemical recurrence: Preliminary findings.
    Shiradkar R; Ghose S; Jambor I; Taimen P; Ettala O; Purysko AS; Madabhushi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 48(6):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 29734484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiomics Based on MRI as a Biomarker to Guide Therapy by Predicting Upgrading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
    Zhang GM; Han YQ; Wei JW; Qi YF; Gu DS; Lei J; Yan WG; Xiao Y; Xue HD; Feng F; Sun H; Jin ZY; Tian J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 52(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 32181985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Kato D; Ozawa K; Takeuchi S; Kawase M; Kawase K; Nakai C; Takai M; Iinuma K; Nakane K; Kato H; Matsuo M; Suzui N; Miyazaki T; Koie T
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Mar; 28(2):1294-1301. PubMed ID: 33809967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.
    Hiremath A; Shiradkar R; Fu P; Mahran A; Rastinehad AR; Tewari A; Tirumani SH; Purysko A; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Lancet Digit Health; 2021 Jul; 3(7):e445-e454. PubMed ID: 34167765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiomics from multisite MRI and clinical data to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Krauss W; Frey J; Heydorn Lagerlöf J; Lidén M; Thunberg P
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Mar; 65(3):307-317. PubMed ID: 38115809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients.
    Caglic I; Sushentsev N; Shah N; Warren AY; Lamb BW; Barrett T
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 141():109804. PubMed ID: 34062473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combined Analysis of Biparametric MRI and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density: Role in the Prebiopsy Diagnosis of Gleason Score 7 or Greater Prostate Cancer.
    Lee SJ; Oh YT; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W166-W172. PubMed ID: 30016148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MRI-Based Surrogate Imaging Markers of Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomic Features.
    Dominguez I; Rios-Ibacache O; Caprile P; Gonzalez J; San Francisco IF; Besa C
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 37685317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.