These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3422729)

  • 1. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
    Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
    Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
    Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries.
    Hintze H; Christoffersen L; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Xeroradiography for imaging biomaterials--A comparison with conventional radiography.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Lacy AM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1980 Nov; 44(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 6934294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A film and cassette holder for simultaneous xeroradiography and conventional radiography in longitudinal studies.
    Griffiths GS; Coulthurst SK; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
    Br Dent J; 1988 Jun; 164(11):365-7. PubMed ID: 3165014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caries detection with xeroradiographs: the influence of observer experience.
    White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 3475648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.