169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34227419)
1. Design of patient specific bone stiffness mimicking scaffold.
Rana M; Chaudhuri A; Biswas JK; Karim SI; Datta P; Karmakar SK; Roychowdhury A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2021 Dec; 235(12):1453-1462. PubMed ID: 34227419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element and experimental analysis to select patient's bone condition specific porous dental implant, fabricated using additive manufacturing.
Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Mondal SC; Roychowdhury A
Comput Biol Med; 2020 Sep; 124():103839. PubMed ID: 32763517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical response at peri-implant mandibular bone for variation of pore characteristics of implants: A Finite Element Study.
Sarkar S; Sahu TP; Datta A; Chandra N; Chakraborty A; Datta P; Majumder S; Chowdhury AR
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 31741483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution of bone tissue around porous titanium implant].
Liu TS; Gao R; Wei T; Sun HQ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 30630257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of porous orthopaedic implant material and structure on load sharing with simulated bone ingrowth: A finite element analysis comparing titanium and PEEK.
Carpenter RD; Klosterhoff BS; Torstrick FB; Foley KT; Burkus JK; Lee CSD; Gall K; Guldberg RE; Safranski DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Apr; 80():68-76. PubMed ID: 29414477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Studies on the performance of selective laser melting porous dental implant by finite element model simulation, fatigue testing and in vivo experiments.
Wang Y; Chen X; Zhang C; Feng W; Zhang P; Chen Y; Huang J; Luo Y; Chen J
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2019 Feb; 233(2):170-180. PubMed ID: 30565502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osseointegration of 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V implants - Narrow gap push-out testing and experimental setup considerations.
Frosch S; Nüsse V; Frosch KH; Lehmann W; Buchhorn G
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104282. PubMed ID: 33348214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient-specific femoral implant design using metamaterials for improving load transfer at proximal-lateral region of the femur.
Singh AP; Rana M; Pal B; Datta P; Majumder S; Roychowdhury A
Med Eng Phys; 2023 Mar; 113():103959. PubMed ID: 36965999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of laser sintered Ti-6Al-4V implants with bone-inspired porosity and micro/nanoscale surface roughness in the rabbit femur.
Cohen DJ; Cheng A; Sahingur K; Clohessy RM; Hopkins LB; Boyan BD; Schwartz Z
Biomed Mater; 2017 Apr; 12(2):025021. PubMed ID: 28452335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agglomeration effect on biomechanical performance of CNT-reinforced dental implant using micromechanics-based approach.
Elleuch S; Jrad H; Wali M; Dammak F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Sep; 145():106023. PubMed ID: 37494815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.
Tepper G; Haas R; Zechner W; Krach W; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 12519342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant Strength Contributes to the Osseointegration Strength of Porous Metallic Materials.
Mathey E; Pelletier MH; Walsh WR; Gall K; Carpenter D
J Biomech Eng; 2024 Oct; 146(10):. PubMed ID: 38668718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical aspects of dental implants and osseointegration: A narrative review.
Li J; Jansen JA; Walboomers XF; van den Beucken JJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103574. PubMed ID: 32090904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of surface chemistry on the rate of osseointegration of sintered porous-surfaced Ti-6Al-4V implants.
Taché A; Gan L; Deporter D; Pilliar RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 14982351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies on the Performance of Molar Porous Root-Analogue Implant by Finite Element Model Simulation and Verification of a Case Report.
Guo F; Hu M; Wang C; Huang S; Lou M; Liu C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 78(11):1965.e1-1965.e9. PubMed ID: 32628934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of a metaphyseal sleeve on the stress-strain state of a bone-tumor implant system in the distal femur: an experimental and finite element analysis.
Li JJ; Tian DM; Yang L; Zhang JY; Hu YC
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 15(1):589. PubMed ID: 33298115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
