251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34228142)
1. Comparison of multiforce nickel-titanium wires to multistrand wires without force zones in bending and torque measurements.
Sanders E; Johannessen L; Nadal J; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Nov; 83(6):382-394. PubMed ID: 34228142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Friction behavior of the wire material Gummetal®.
Kopsahilis IE; Drescher D
J Orofac Orthop; 2022 Jan; 83(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 34228140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numeric modeling of torque capabilities of self-ligating and conventional brackets.
Huang Y; Keilig L; Rahimi A; Reimann S; Eliades T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 19892278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical properties of different esthetic and conventional orthodontic wires in bending tests : An in vitro study.
Alobeid A; Dirk C; Reimann S; El-Bialy T; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):241-252. PubMed ID: 27942768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative assessment of the forces and moments generated at the maxillary incisors between conventional and self-ligating brackets using a reverse curve of Spee NiTi archwire.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Bourauel C
Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21175021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors.
Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of bracket-slot design on the forces released by superelastic nickel-titanium alignment wires in different deflection configurations.
Nucera R; Gatto E; Borsellino C; Aceto P; Fabiano F; Matarese G; Perillo L; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 24067050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of torque expression between stainless steel, titanium molybdenum alloy, and copper nickel titanium wires in metallic self-ligating brackets.
Archambault A; Major TW; Carey JP; Heo G; Badawi H; Major PW
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):884-9. PubMed ID: 20578859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro biomechanical analysis of torque capabilities of various 0.018″ lingual bracket-wire systems: total torque play and slot size.
Daratsianos N; Bourauel C; Fimmers R; Jäger A; Schwestka-Polly R
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct; 38(5):459-69. PubMed ID: 26518759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.
Perrey W; Konermann A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):129-38, 140-2. PubMed ID: 25744092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular dental arch changes with active self-ligating brackets combined with different archwires.
Atik E; Akarsu-Guven B; Kocadereli I
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 May; 21(5):566-572. PubMed ID: 29735855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the force levels among labial and lingual self-ligating and conventional brackets in simulated misaligned teeth.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Khawatmi S; Dirk C; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug; 39(4):419-425. PubMed ID: 28339591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new elastic slot system and V-wire mechanics.
Wichelhaus A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):774-781. PubMed ID: 28530449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
Husain N; Kumar A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moments generated by simple V-bends in nickel titanium wires.
Quick AN; Lim Y; Loke C; Juan J; Swain M; Herbison P
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 20956387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.
Monteiro MR; Silva LE; Elias CN; Vilella Ode V
J Appl Oral Sci; 2014 Jun; 22(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 25025564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
