These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34229172)

  • 1. Effect of specific retention biomaterials for ball attachment on the biomechanical response of single implant-supported overdenture: A finite element analysis.
    Gibreel M; Sameh A; Hegazy S; Närhi TO; Vallittu PK; Perea-Lowery L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Oct; 122():104653. PubMed ID: 34229172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
    Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study.
    Amaral CF; Gomes RS; Rodrigues Garcia RCM; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):791-796. PubMed ID: 28965674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Bone Heights and Attachment Types: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Unsal GS; Erbasar GNH; Aykent F; Ozyilmaz OY; Ozdogan MS
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Oct; 45(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 31536445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 3-D Finite Element Analysis of a Single Implant Retained Overdenture Reinforced with Short Versus Long Frameworks.
    El-Okl AB; Abou Neel EA
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 33393743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparative Evaluation of Stress Distribution with Two Attachment Systems of Varying Heights in a Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Khurana N; Rodrigues S; Shenoy S; Saldanha S; Pai U; Shetty T; N S; Mahesh M; Hegde P
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e795-e805. PubMed ID: 30191668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical behavior of 2-implant- and single-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional or mini implants.
    Pisani MX; Presotto AGC; Mesquita MF; Barão VAR; Kemmoku DT; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):421-430. PubMed ID: 29703669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone as a dental implant material in implant-supported overdenture under mandibular trauma: A finite element analysis study.
    Bilginaylar K; Ayali A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1538-1546. PubMed ID: 37929532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
    J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distributions for Mandibular Dental Implant-Supported Overdentures with Magnetic Attachments in Osteoporotic and Normal Bone.
    Hu F; Zhang L; Zhang J; Zheng Y; Li Y; Zhang X; Song L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 38381984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of peri-implant bone volume affected by stresses around Morse taper implants: effects of implant positioning to the bone crest.
    Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Souza JCM; Alves JL; López-López J; Henriques B
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2018 Sep; 21(12):655-662. PubMed ID: 30693810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Different implant diameters and their effect on stress distribution pattern in 2-implant mandibular overdentures: A 3D finite element analysis study.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Pau A; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):675-682. PubMed ID: 35667890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis.
    Chang SH; Huang SR; Huang SF; Lin CL
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(8):911-21. PubMed ID: 26212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is one dental mini-implant biomechanically appropriate for the retention of a mandibular overdenture? A comparison with Morse taper and external hexagon platforms.
    Borges GA; Presotto AGC; Caldas RA; Pisani MX; Mesquita MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Mar; 125(3):491-499. PubMed ID: 32278498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.