338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34229553)
1. Antenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies affected by maternal pre-gestational diabetes.
O'Dwyer V; Russell NM; McDonnell B; Sharkey L; Mulcahy C; Higgins MF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7412-7416. PubMed ID: 34229553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal anterior abdominal wall thickness in diabetic pregnancy.
Higgins MF; Russell NM; Mulcahy CH; Coffey M; Foley ME; McAuliffe FM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Sep; 140(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18406510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement and evaluation of fetal fat layer in the prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes.
Elessawy M; Harders C; Kleinwechter H; Demandt N; Sheasha GA; Maass N; Pecks U; Eckmann-Scholz C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):445-453. PubMed ID: 28631075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of umbilical cord thickness and HbA1c levels for the prediction of fetal macrosomia in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Binbir B; Yeniel AO; Ergenoglu AM; Kazandi M; Akercan F; Sagol S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):635-9. PubMed ID: 21837429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal front-abdominal wall thickness in the second trimester as a predictor of abnormal fetal growth.
Madendag Y; Aksoy U; Col Madendag I; Aksoy H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Mar; 35(6):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32208785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal circumference profiles of macrosomic infants born to mothers with or without hyperglycemia in China.
Yan J; Yang H; Meng W; Wang Y; Shang L; Cai Z; Ji L; Wang Y; Sun Y; Liu J; Wei L; Sun Y; Zhang X; Luo T; Chen H; Yu L; Liu X; Wang Z; Chen H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jan; 33(1):149-156. PubMed ID: 29886780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. First-trimester glycaemic markers as predictors of gestational diabetes and its associated adverse outcomes: A prospective cohort study.
D'Arcy RJ; Cooke IE; McKinley M; McCance DR; Graham UM
Diabet Med; 2023 Feb; 40(2):e15019. PubMed ID: 36453695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation of Fetal Anterior Abdominal Wall Thickness and Other Standard Biometric Ultrasound Measurements to Predict Fetal Macrosomia in Gestational Diabetes.
Bansal A; Thukral BB; Bagri N; Kanwar A; Khandelwal A; Bajaj B
J Med Ultrasound; 2023; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 37180617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models.
Badr DA; Cannie MM; Kadji C; Kang X; Carlin A; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):557.e1-557.e8. PubMed ID: 37827273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal growth profiles of macrosomic and non-macrosomic infants of women with pregestational or gestational diabetes.
Hammoud NM; Visser GH; Peters SA; Graatsma EM; Pistorius L; de Valk HW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 22744817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula.
Shmueli A; Salman L; Hadar E; Aviram A; Bardin R; Ashwal E; Gabbay-Benziv R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large cross-sectional area of the umbilical cord as a predictor of fetal macrosomia.
Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Di Naro E; Siesto G; Bergamini V; Raio L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 30(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 17960667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.
Ciobanu A; Anthoulakis C; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30912210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are there specific factors associated with prenatally undiagnosed foetal macrosomia?
Ouazana M; Girault A; Goffinet F; Lepercq J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 49(8):101802. PubMed ID: 32438136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
