BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34231066)

  • 21. Formalizing video documentation of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a step towards artificial intelligence assistance to improve surgical safety.
    Mascagni P; Fiorillo C; Urade T; Emre T; Yu T; Wakabayashi T; Felli E; Perretta S; Swanstrom L; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Pessaux P; Costamagna G; Padoy N; Dallemagne B
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2709-2714. PubMed ID: 31583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparative validation of machine learning algorithms for surgical workflow and skill analysis with the HeiChole benchmark.
    Wagner M; Müller-Stich BP; Kisilenko A; Tran D; Heger P; Mündermann L; Lubotsky DM; Müller B; Davitashvili T; Capek M; Reinke A; Reid C; Yu T; Vardazaryan A; Nwoye CI; Padoy N; Liu X; Lee EJ; Disch C; Meine H; Xia T; Jia F; Kondo S; Reiter W; Jin Y; Long Y; Jiang M; Dou Q; Heng PA; Twick I; Kirtac K; Hosgor E; Bolmgren JL; Stenzel M; von Siemens B; Zhao L; Ge Z; Sun H; Xie D; Guo M; Liu D; Kenngott HG; Nickel F; Frankenberg MV; Mathis-Ullrich F; Kopp-Schneider A; Maier-Hein L; Speidel S; Bodenstedt S
    Med Image Anal; 2023 May; 86():102770. PubMed ID: 36889206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated laparoscopic colorectal surgery workflow recognition using artificial intelligence: Experimental research.
    Kitaguchi D; Takeshita N; Matsuzaki H; Oda T; Watanabe M; Mori K; Kobayashi E; Ito M
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jul; 79():88-94. PubMed ID: 32413503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Automated operative workflow analysis of endoscopic pituitary surgery using machine learning: development and preclinical evaluation (IDEAL stage 0).
    Khan DZ; Luengo I; Barbarisi S; Addis C; Culshaw L; Dorward NL; Haikka P; Jain A; Kerr K; Koh CH; Layard Horsfall H; Muirhead W; Palmisciano P; Vasey B; Stoyanov D; Marcus HJ
    J Neurosurg; 2022 Jul; 137(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 34740198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Limited generalizability of single deep neural network for surgical instrument segmentation in different surgical environments.
    Kitaguchi D; Fujino T; Takeshita N; Hasegawa H; Mori K; Ito M
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12575. PubMed ID: 35869249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Computer Vision Platform to Automatically Locate Critical Events in Surgical Videos: Documenting Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Mascagni P; Alapatt D; Urade T; Vardazaryan A; Mutter D; Marescaux J; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Ann Surg; 2021 Jul; 274(1):e93-e95. PubMed ID: 33417329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical Phase Recognition in Inguinal Hernia Repair-AI-Based Confirmatory Baseline and Exploration of Competitive Models.
    Zang C; Turkcan MK; Narasimhan S; Cao Y; Yarali K; Xiang Z; Szot S; Ahmad F; Choksi S; Bitner DP; Filicori F; Kostic Z
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 May; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 37370585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analyzing Surgical Technique in Diverse Open Surgical Videos With Multitask Machine Learning.
    Goodman ED; Patel KK; Zhang Y; Locke W; Kennedy CJ; Mehrotra R; Ren S; Guan M; Zohar O; Downing M; Chen HW; Clark JZ; Berrigan MT; Brat GA; Yeung-Levy S
    JAMA Surg; 2024 Feb; 159(2):185-192. PubMed ID: 38055227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of deep learning framework for anatomical landmark detection and guided dissection line during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Smithmaitrie P; Khaonualsri M; Sae-Lim W; Wangkulangkul P; Jearanai S; Cheewatanakornkul S
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25210. PubMed ID: 38327394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Computer-vision-based artificial intelligence for detection and recognition of instruments and organs during radical laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter study].
    Zhang KC; Qiao Z; Yang L; Zhang T; Liu FL; Sun DC; Xie TY; Guo L; Lu CR
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 27(5):464-470. PubMed ID: 38778686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deep learning visual analysis in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
    Anteby R; Horesh N; Soffer S; Zager Y; Barash Y; Amiel I; Rosin D; Gutman M; Klang E
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1521-1533. PubMed ID: 33398560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Introducing surgical intelligence in gynecology: Automated identification of key steps in hysterectomy.
    Levin I; Rapoport Ferman J; Bar O; Ben Ayoun D; Cohen A; Wolf T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Automated surgical step recognition in transurethral bladder tumor resection using artificial intelligence: transfer learning across surgical modalities.
    Deol ES; Tollefson MK; Antolin A; Zohar M; Bar O; Ben-Ayoun D; Mynderse LA; Lomas DJ; Avant RA; Miller AR; Elliott DS; Boorjian SA; Wolf T; Asselmann D; Khanna A
    Front Artif Intell; 2024; 7():1375482. PubMed ID: 38525302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Towards automatic verification of the critical view of the myopectineal orifice with artificial intelligence.
    Takeuchi M; Collins T; Lipps C; Haller M; Uwineza J; Okamoto N; Nkusi R; Marescaux J; Kawakubo H; Kitagawa Y; Gonzalez C; Mutter D; Perretta S; Hostettler A; Dallemagne B
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4525-4534. PubMed ID: 36828887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Keyframe extraction from laparoscopic videos based on visual saliency detection.
    Loukas C; Varytimidis C; Rapantzikos K; Kanakis MA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 165():13-23. PubMed ID: 30337068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Machine Learning for Surgical Phase Recognition: A Systematic Review.
    Garrow CR; Kowalewski KF; Li L; Wagner M; Schmidt MW; Engelhardt S; Hashimoto DA; Kenngott HG; Bodenstedt S; Speidel S; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Ann Surg; 2021 Apr; 273(4):684-693. PubMed ID: 33201088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Mascagni P; Alapatt D; Laracca GG; Guerriero L; Spota A; Fiorillo C; Vardazaryan A; Quero G; Alfieri S; Baldari L; Cassinotti E; Boni L; Cuccurullo D; Costamagna G; Dallemagne B; Padoy N
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Nov; 36(11):8379-8386. PubMed ID: 35171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cut or Do Not Cut? Assessing Perceptions of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Surgical Videos.
    Carr BD; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1583-1588. PubMed ID: 29929815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A novel deep learning method to segment parathyroid glands on intraoperative videos of thyroid surgery.
    Sang T; Yu F; Zhao J; Wu B; Ding X; Shen C
    Front Surg; 2024; 11():1370017. PubMed ID: 38708363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated artificial intelligence-based phase-recognition system for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video).
    Furube T; Takeuchi M; Kawakubo H; Maeda Y; Matsuda S; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Kato M; Yahagi N; Kitagawa Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2024 May; 99(5):830-838. PubMed ID: 38185182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.