204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34231228)
1. Presentation of unpaired unconditional stimuli during extinction reduces renewal of conditional fear and slows re-acquisition.
Lipp OV; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Waters AM
Psychophysiology; 2021 Oct; 58(10):e13899. PubMed ID: 34231228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Enhancing extinction learning: Occasional presentations of the unconditioned stimulus during extinction eliminate spontaneous recovery, but not necessarily reacquisition of fear.
Thompson A; McEvoy PM; Lipp OV
Behav Res Ther; 2018 Sep; 108():29-39. PubMed ID: 29981936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. To remove or not to remove? Removal of the unconditional stimulus electrode does not mediate instructed extinction effects.
Luck CC; Lipp OV
Psychophysiology; 2015 Sep; 52(9):1248-56. PubMed ID: 26032171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conceptual generalisation in fear conditioning using single and multiple category exemplars as conditional stimuli - electrodermal responses and valence evaluations generalise to the broader category.
Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
Cogn Emot; 2022 Jun; 36(4):630-642. PubMed ID: 35503408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Building physiological toughness: Some aversive events during extinction may attenuate return of fear.
Culver NC; Stevens S; Fanselow MS; Craske MG
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Mar; 58():18-28. PubMed ID: 28777975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluative conditioning affects the subsequent acquisition of differential fear conditioning as indexed by electrodermal responding and stimulus evaluations.
Lipp OV; Luck CC; Muir AC
Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13505. PubMed ID: 31736088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates).
Luck CC; Lipp OV
Cogn Emot; 2018 Feb; 32(1):61-80. PubMed ID: 28141482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Context and renewal of conditioned fear: an experimental evaluation using 20% carbon dioxide-enriched air as an unconditioned stimulus.
Finlay CG; Forsyth JP
J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Aug; 23(6):737-45. PubMed ID: 19342193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interoceptive fear conditioning and panic disorder: the role of conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus predictability.
Acheson DT; Forsyth JP; Moses E
Behav Ther; 2012 Mar; 43(1):174-89. PubMed ID: 22304889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novelty-facilitated extinction and the reinstatement of conditional human fear.
Lucas K; Luck CC; Lipp OV
Behav Res Ther; 2018 Oct; 109():68-74. PubMed ID: 30120999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The absence of differential electrodermal responding in the second half of acquisition does not indicate the absence of fear learning.
Lipp OV; Luck CC; Waters AM
Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13982. PubMed ID: 34846758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioning.
Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14278. PubMed ID: 36929597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate extinction promotes the return of fear.
Merz CJ; Hamacher-Dang TC; Wolf OT
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 May; 131():109-16. PubMed ID: 26995309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Prepared" fear or socio-cultural learning? Fear conditioned to guns, snakes, and spiders is eliminated by instructed extinction in a within-participant differential fear conditioning paradigm.
Luck CC; Patterson RR; Lipp OV
Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13516. PubMed ID: 31828815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. No evidence for blocking the return of fear by disrupting reconsolidation prior to extinction learning.
Klucken T; Kruse O; Schweckendiek J; Kuepper Y; Mueller EM; Hennig J; Stark R
Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():112-22. PubMed ID: 27111105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Approximating exposure therapy in the lab: Replacing the CS+ with a similar versus a different stimulus and including additional stimuli resembling the CS+ during extinction.
Waters AM; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Lipp OV
Behav Res Ther; 2023 Aug; 167():104357. PubMed ID: 37364363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conditional stimulus choices affect fear learning: Comparing fear conditioning with neutral faces and shapes or angry faces.
Ney LJ; Luck CC; Waters AM; Lipp OV
Psychophysiology; 2022 Oct; 59(10):e14068. PubMed ID: 35477888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Renewal of conditioned fear responses using a film clip as the aversive unconditioned stimulus.
Landkroon E; Mertens G; Sevenster D; Dibbets P; Engelhard IM
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2019 Dec; 65():101493. PubMed ID: 31203173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of presenting additional stimuli resembling the CS+ during extinction on extinction retention and generalisation to novel stimuli.
Waters AM; Ryan KM; Luck CC; Craske MG; Lipp OV
Behav Res Ther; 2021 Sep; 144():103921. PubMed ID: 34214823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning to fear suffocation: a new paradigm for interoceptive fear conditioning.
Pappens M; Smets E; Vansteenwegen D; Van Den Bergh O; Van Diest I
Psychophysiology; 2012 Jun; 49(6):821-8. PubMed ID: 22332799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
