166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3423266)
1. "Poor nursing practice": expert opinions. Case in point: Breit v. St. Luke's Memorial Hosp. (743 P. 2d 1254--WA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Dec; 28(7):4. PubMed ID: 3423266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Injection technique: R.N. expert opinion. Case in point: Tripp v. Humana, Inc. (474 So. 2d 88 - AL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Oct; 26(5):2. PubMed ID: 3852349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Employee handbooks: your legal rights. Case in point: Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hosp. (505 N.E. 2d 314-IL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 May; 27(12):2. PubMed ID: 3648826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Intentional & unintentional acts: malpractice. Case in point: Cudges v. Our Lady of Lourdes Hosp. (514 So. 2d 195--LA).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jan; 28(8):4. PubMed ID: 3344350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Nurses, unions, and hospital attitudes. Case in point: Crestline Memorial Hosp. v. NLRB (668 F. 2d 243 - OHIO).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1982 Apr; 22(11):2. PubMed ID: 6919170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Failure to monitor patient: deplorable nursing care. Case in point: Harrington v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's (569 N.E. 2d 15--IL (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Jun; 32(1):2. PubMed ID: 1862213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Unknown nurse" injects patient with dirty needle. Case in point: Stegmeier v. St. Elizabeth Hosp. (571 A. 2d 1006--NJ (1990)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1990 Jun; 31(1):2. PubMed ID: 2371407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Was apnea monitor on or off? Expert testimony. Case in point: Dent v. Memorial Hosp. of Adel, Inc. (408 S.E.2d 473--GA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jan; 32(8):2. PubMed ID: 1542727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Does judgment for nurse require judgment for hospital? Case in point: Eversole v. Oklahoma Hosp. Founders (818 P. 2d. 456--OK (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Feb; 32(9):4. PubMed ID: 1565799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patients' word v. nurse's word: documentation. Case in point: Sheppard v. Kimbrough (318 S.E. 2d - SC).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Nov; 25(6):4. PubMed ID: 6568727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Captain of ship doctrine: vicarious liability. Case in point: Krane v. Saint Anthony Hosp. Systems (738 P. 2d 75-CO).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1987 Aug; 28(3):4. PubMed ID: 2442796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Will the St. Mary's case challenge us to change?
Hallfors D
Ariz Nurse; 1988; 41(2):5. PubMed ID: 3369947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who has responsibility to monitor O.R. blood loss? Case in point: Uhr v. Lutheran General Hospital (589 N.E.2d 723--IL [1992]).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):2. PubMed ID: 1410393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurse-expert's testimony held admissible. Case in point: Wickliffe v. Sunrise Hosp., Inc. (766 P. 2d 1322--NV (1988)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):2. PubMed ID: 2704834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Nurse fails to follow "doctor's policy": death results. Case in point: Hartman v. Riverside Methodist Hosp. (577 N.E.2d 112--OH (1989)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):2. PubMed ID: 1722340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Doctor "on call": ER nurse sued. Case in point: Bartimus v. Paxton Community Hosp. (458 N.E. 2d 1072 - IL).
Regan WA
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1984 Mar; 24(10):4. PubMed ID: 6561693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians retract opinion: nurses not negligent. Case in point: Galloway v. Baton Rouge General Hosp. (583 So. 2d 1169--LA (1991)).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Nov; 32(6):4. PubMed ID: 1763180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. X-ray machine falls on patient: nurses' liability issue. Case in point: Carter v. Anderson Memorial Hosp. (325 S.E. 2d 78--SC).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1985 Apr; 25(11):2. PubMed ID: 3846311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are you held to the standard of a nurse specialist? Case in point: Northern Trust Co. v. Louis A. Weiss Mem. Hosp. (493 N.E. 2d 5 - IL).
Tammelleo AD
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1986 Aug; 27(3):2. PubMed ID: 3638741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
