These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34232835)

  • 21. Gene expression analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using gene set enrichment analysis for biostatistical management.
    Maruschke M; Reuter D; Koczan D; Hakenberg OW; Thiesen HJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E29-35. PubMed ID: 21435154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Unifying gene expression measures from multiple platforms using factor analysis.
    Wang XV; Verhaak RG; Purdom E; Spellman PT; Speed TP
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17691. PubMed ID: 21436879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robust multi-tissue gene panel for cancer detection.
    Irgon J; Huang CC; Zhang Y; Talantov D; Bhanot G; Szalma S
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Jun; 10():319. PubMed ID: 20569444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Uncovering biomarker genes with enriched classification potential from Hallmark gene sets.
    Targonski CA; Shearer CA; Shealy BT; Smith MC; Feltus FA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9747. PubMed ID: 31278367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feature selection and tumor classification for microarray data using relaxed Lasso and generalized multi-class support vector machine.
    Kang C; Huo Y; Xin L; Tian B; Yu B
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Feb; 463():77-91. PubMed ID: 30537483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of genes associated with multiple cancers via integrative analysis.
    Ma S; Huang J; Moran MS
    BMC Genomics; 2009 Nov; 10():535. PubMed ID: 19919702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multi-class cancer classification via partial least squares with gene expression profiles.
    Nguyen DV; Rocke DM
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Sep; 18(9):1216-26. PubMed ID: 12217913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detecting the violation of variance homogeneity in mixed models.
    Fang X; Li J; Wong WK; Fu B
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2506-2520. PubMed ID: 24659492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multi-platform gene-expression mining and marker gene analysis.
    Xu Q; Xue H; Yang Q
    Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2011; 5(5):485-503. PubMed ID: 22145530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A two-step hierarchical hypothesis set testing framework, with applications to gene expression data on ordered categories.
    Li Y; Ghosh D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():108. PubMed ID: 24731138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Applications of multivariate modeling to neuroimaging group analysis: a comprehensive alternative to univariate general linear model.
    Chen G; Adleman NE; Saad ZS; Leibenluft E; Cox RW
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():571-88. PubMed ID: 24954281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sequential analysis of transcript expression patterns improves survival prediction in multiple cancers.
    Mandel J; Avula R; Prochownik EV
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Apr; 20(1):297. PubMed ID: 32264880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The shape of gene expression distributions matter: how incorporating distribution shape improves the interpretation of cancer transcriptomic data.
    de Torrenté L; Zimmerman S; Suzuki M; Christopeit M; Greally JM; Mar JC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Dec; 21(Suppl 21):562. PubMed ID: 33371881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of survival analysis methods for cancer gene expression RNA-Sequencing data.
    Raman P; Zimmerman S; Rathi KS; de Torrenté L; Sarmady M; Wu C; Leipzig J; Taylor DM; Tozeren A; Mar JC
    Cancer Genet; 2019 Jun; 235-236():1-12. PubMed ID: 31296308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploring drivers of gene expression in the Cancer Genome Atlas.
    Rau A; Flister M; Rui H; Auer PL
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30561551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. HYPOTHESIS TESTING ON LINEAR STRUCTURES OF HIGH DIMENSIONAL COVARIANCE MATRIX.
    Zheng S; Chen Z; Cui H; Li R
    Ann Stat; 2019; 47(6):3300-3334. PubMed ID: 31839687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Functional connectivity metrics during stroke recovery.
    Yourganov G; Schmah T; Small SL; Rasmussen PM; Strother SC
    Arch Ital Biol; 2010 Sep; 148(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 21175012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The expression pattern of matrix-producing tumor stroma is of prognostic importance in breast cancer.
    Winslow S; Lindquist KE; Edsjö A; Larsson C
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Nov; 16(1):841. PubMed ID: 27809802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulation-based hypothesis testing of high dimensional means under covariance heterogeneity.
    Chang J; Zheng C; Zhou WX; Zhou W
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1300-1310. PubMed ID: 28369742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Covariance adjustment for batch effect in gene expression data.
    Lee JA; Dobbin KK; Ahn J
    Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2681-95. PubMed ID: 24687561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.