These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Increased greenhouse gas emissions intensity of major croplands in China: Implications for food security and climate change mitigation. Zhang J; Tian H; Shi H; Zhang J; Wang X; Pan S; Yang J Glob Chang Biol; 2020 Nov; 26(11):6116-6133. PubMed ID: 32697859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sustainable utilization of biomass resources for decentralized energy generation and climate change mitigation: A regional case study in India. Vijay V; Kapoor R; Singh P; Hiloidhari M; Ghosh P Environ Res; 2022 Sep; 212(Pt B):113257. PubMed ID: 35398315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The GHG mitigation opportunity of sludge management in China. Chen W; Liu J; Zhu BH; Shi MY; Zhao SQ; He MZ; Yan P; Fang F; Guo JS; Li W; Chen YP Environ Res; 2022 Sep; 212(Pt C):113284. PubMed ID: 35504342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Livestock greenhouse gas emission and mitigation potential in China. He D; Deng X; Wang X; Zhang F J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119494. PubMed ID: 37924696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Climate change mitigation in British Columbia's forest sector: GHG reductions, costs, and environmental impacts. Smyth CE; Xu Z; Lemprière TC; Kurz WA Carbon Balance Manag; 2020 Oct; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 33001303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions. Smyth CE; Smiley BP; Magnan M; Birdsey R; Dugan AJ; Olguin M; Mascorro VS; Kurz WA Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Sep; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 30187146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China. Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sustainable intensification of crop residue exploitation for bioenergy: Opportunities and challenges. Mouratiadou I; Stella T; Gaiser T; Wicke B; Nendel C; Ewert F; van der Hilst F Glob Change Biol Bioenergy; 2020 Jan; 12(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 32025242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Estimating the carbon storage potential and greenhouse gas emissions of French arable cropland using high-resolution modeling. Launay C; Constantin J; Chlebowski F; Houot S; Graux AI; Klumpp K; Martin R; Mary B; Pellerin S; Therond O Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Apr; 27(8):1645-1661. PubMed ID: 33421219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A meta-analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement of bioenergy factoring in land use changes. El Akkari M; Réchauchère O; Bispo A; Gabrielle B; Makowski D Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8563. PubMed ID: 29867194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Potential environmental benefits from increased use of bioenergy in China. Fan S; Freedman B; Gao J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):504-15. PubMed ID: 17638052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. LEAP-Based Greenhouse Gases Emissions Peak and Low Carbon Pathways in China's Tourist Industry. Liu D; Yang D; Huang A Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33572995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China. Liu Z; Guan D; Wei W; Davis SJ; Ciais P; Bai J; Peng S; Zhang Q; Hubacek K; Marland G; Andres RJ; Crawford-Brown D; Lin J; Zhao H; Hong C; Boden TA; Feng K; Peters GP; Xi F; Liu J; Li Y; Zhao Y; Zeng N; He K Nature; 2015 Aug; 524(7565):335-8. PubMed ID: 26289204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing the Returns to Land and Greenhouse Gas Savings from Producing Energy Crops on Conservation Reserve Program Land. Chen L; Blanc-Betes E; Hudiburg TW; Hellerstein D; Wallander S; DeLucia EH; Khanna M Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Jan; 55(2):1301-1309. PubMed ID: 33410666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Swine Manure Management: A System Analysis. Wang Y; Dong H; Zhu Z; Gerber PJ; Xin H; Smith P; Opio C; Steinfeld H; Chadwick D Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Apr; 51(8):4503-4511. PubMed ID: 28318241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Bioenergy Crops for Low Warming Targets Require Half of the Present Agricultural Fertilizer Use. Li W; Ciais P; Han M; Zhao Q; Chang J; Goll DS; Zhu L; Wang J Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 55(15):10654-10661. PubMed ID: 34288664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Research on the relationship between China's greenhouse gas emissions and industrial structure and economic growth from the perspective of energy consumption. Zhang Z; Ma X; Lian X; Guo Y; Song Y; Chang B; Luo L Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Nov; 27(33):41839-41855. PubMed ID: 32700267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Greenhouse gas emissions during MSW landfilling in China: influence of waste characteristics and LFG treatment measures. Yang N; Zhang H; Shao LM; Lü F; He PJ J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():510-21. PubMed ID: 24018116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Geospatial analysis of near-term potential for carbon-negative bioenergy in the United States. Baik E; Sanchez DL; Turner PA; Mach KJ; Field CB; Benson SM Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Mar; 115(13):3290-3295. PubMed ID: 29531081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]