145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34236008)
1. Ultrasonographic Detection of Vascularity of Focal Breast Lesions: Microvascular Imaging Versus Conventional Color and Power Doppler Imaging.
Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Schillaci MI; Spatafora L; Marco MD; Matranga D; Firenze A; Cirino A; Ienzi R
Ultrason Imaging; 2021 Sep; 43(5):273-281. PubMed ID: 34236008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microvascular Flow Imaging of Residual or Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization: Comparison with Color/Power Doppler Imaging.
Kang HJ; Lee JM; Jeon SK; Ryu H; Yoo J; Lee JK; Han JK
Korean J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 20(7):1114-1123. PubMed ID: 31270975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of Superb Microvascular Imaging in Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Solid Breast Masses.
Diao X; Zhan J; Chen L; Chen Y; Cao H
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(6):e786-e793. PubMed ID: 32863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Power Doppler in breast tumours: a comparison with conventional colour Doppler imaging.
Wright IA; Pugh ND; Lyons K; Webster DJ; Mansel RE
Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 9700212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of microvascular flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for blood flow analysis of cervical lymph node lesions.
Wang T; Xu M; Xu C; Wu Y; Dong X
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2023; 85(3):249-259. PubMed ID: 37694358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler sonography.
Kook SH; Park HW; Lee YR; Lee YU; Pae WK; Park YL
J Clin Ultrasound; 1999 Jun; 27(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 10355886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of microvascular evaluation of ductal lesions on breast ultrasonography: Influence on diagnostic performance.
Kim ES; Seo BK; Park EK; Woo OH; Jung K; Cho KR; Song SE; Cha J
Clin Imaging; 2018; 51():252-259. PubMed ID: 29902659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Superb Microvascular Imaging Improves Detection of Vascularity in Indeterminate Renal Masses.
Leong JY; Wessner CE; Kramer MR; Forsberg F; Halpern EJ; Lyshchik A; Torkzaban M; Morris A; Byrne K; VanMeter M; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Oct; 39(10):1947-1955. PubMed ID: 32309889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Additional value of superb microvascular imaging of ultrasound examinations to evaluate focal liver lesions.
Jeon SK; Lee JY; Kang HJ; Han JK
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Jul; 152():110332. PubMed ID: 35552066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of breast ultrasound color Doppler vascular pattern morphology improves diagnostic sensitivity with minimal change in specificity.
Svensson WE; Pandian AJ; Hashimoto H
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):466-74. PubMed ID: 20094978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Superb microvascular imaging (SMI) compared with conventional ultrasound for evaluating thyroid nodules.
Lu R; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhao W; Wang X; Jin M; Guo R
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Dec; 17(1):65. PubMed ID: 29281991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of ultrasound Angio-PLUS imaging for detecting blood flow in breast masses and comparison with color Doppler for differentiating benign from malignant masses.
Mohindra N; Jain N; Yadav S; Agrawal V; Mishra P; Mishra A; Agarwal G
Acta Radiol; 2023 Jun; 64(6):2087-2095. PubMed ID: 36890701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of color and power doppler imaging in differentiating between malignant and benign solid breast masses.
Lee SW; Choi HY; Baek SY; Lim SM
J Clin Ultrasound; 2002 Oct; 30(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 12242733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preliminary experience with power Doppler imaging of solid breast masses.
Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; Jeffrey SS; Jeffrey RB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 9275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.
Xiao XY; Chen X; Guan XF; Wu H; Qin W; Luo BM
Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20160546. PubMed ID: 27529640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of ultrasound superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of breast tumour vascularity: comparison with colour and power Doppler imaging regarding diagnostic performance.
Park AY; Seo BK; Woo OH; Jung KS; Cho KR; Park EK; Cha SH; Cha J
Clin Radiol; 2018 Mar; 73(3):304-311. PubMed ID: 29122223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the Superb Microvascular Imaging Method in the Distinction of Intraductal Papilloma and Duct Ectasia With Secretion.
Tek C; Öztekin PS; Celepli P; Uçar F; Koşar PN
J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Feb; 40(2):269-277. PubMed ID: 32681668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of MicroFlow Imaging with color and power Doppler imaging for detecting and characterizing blood flow signals in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Bae JS; Lee JM; Jeon SK; Jang S
Ultrasonography; 2020 Jan; 39(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 31759383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Superb microvascular imaging for evaluation of microvascularity in breast nodules compared with conventional Doppler imaging.
Zhang X; Cheng F; Song X; Wang P; Tian S; Zhao X; Wang Q; Zhang M
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Oct; 13(10):7029-7040. PubMed ID: 37869333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
