184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34236579)
1. Combining EQ-5D-5L items into a level summary score: demonstrating feasibility using non-parametric item response theory using an international dataset.
Feng YS; Jiang R; Pickard AS; Kohlmann T
Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 34236579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scoring the EQ-HWB-S: can we do it without value sets? A non-parametric item response theory analysis.
Feng YS; Kohlmann T; Peasgood T; Engel L; Mulhern B; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2024 May; 33(5):1211-1222. PubMed ID: 38381281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the Internal Structure of the EQ-5D Using Non-Preference-Based Methods.
Feng YS; Jiang R; Kohlmann T; Pickard AS
Value Health; 2019 May; 22(5):527-536. PubMed ID: 31104730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Comparison of Items and Constructs of Standardized Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Well-Being Measures.
Mao Z; Crèvecoeur J; Pepermans K; Kind P; Neyens T; Beutels P
Value Health; 2024 Apr; 27(4):478-489. PubMed ID: 38296048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Investigation of Age-Related Differential Item Functioning in the EQ-5D-5L Using Item Response Theory and Logistic Regression.
Penton H; Dayson C; Hulme C; Young T
Value Health; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1566-1574. PubMed ID: 35487819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of the anxiety/depression dimension of the 3- and 5-level versions of the EQ-5D in assessing mental health.
Crick K; Al Sayah F; Ohinmaa A; Johnson JA
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1625-1633. PubMed ID: 29516342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mapping ALSFRS-R and ALSUI to EQ-5D in Patients with Motor Neuron Disease.
Moore A; Young CA; Hughes DA
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 30442280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.
Franklin M; Hunter RM; Enrique A; Palacios J; Richards D
Value Health; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1018-1029. PubMed ID: 35667775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The added value of extending the EQ-5D-5L with an itching item for the assessment of health-related quality of life of burn patients: an explorative study.
Spronk I; Bonsel GJ; Polinder S; van Baar ME; Janssen MF; Haagsma JA
Burns; 2021 Jun; 47(4):873-879. PubMed ID: 33012569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Instrument-Defined Estimates of the Minimally Important Difference for EQ-5D-5L Index Scores.
McClure NS; Sayah FA; Xie F; Luo N; Johnson JA
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28408007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in recording self-reported health status in older patients with substantial multimorbidity and polypharmacy.
Bhadhuri A; Kind P; Salari P; Jungo KT; Boland B; Byrne S; Hossmann S; Dalleur O; Knol W; Moutzouri E; O'Mahony D; Murphy KD; Wisselink L; Rodondi N; Schwenkglenks M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2020 Sep; 18(1):317. PubMed ID: 32993637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health-related quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using EQ-5D-5L.
Wei QQ; Hou Y; Chen Y; Ou R; Cao B; Zhang L; Yang T; Shang H
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jul; 19(1):181. PubMed ID: 34284776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A hearing bolt-on item increased the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L in a community-based hearing loss screening program.
Wang P; Chong SL; Tan RL; Luo N
Eur J Health Econ; 2023 Apr; 24(3):393-398. PubMed ID: 35661940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the PROMIS Preference Score (PROPr) and EQ-5D-5L Index Value in General Population Samples in the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.
Klapproth CP; Sidey-Gibbons CJ; Valderas JM; Rose M; Fischer F
Value Health; 2022 May; 25(5):824-834. PubMed ID: 35500951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with major depression: factor analysis and Rasch analysis.
Bilbao A; Martín-Fernández J; García-Pérez L; Mendezona JI; Arrasate M; Candela R; Acosta FJ; Estebanez S; Retolaza A
J Ment Health; 2022 Aug; 31(4):506-516. PubMed ID: 33522336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.
McCaffrey N; Kaambwa B; Currow DC; Ratcliffe J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Sep; 14(1):133. PubMed ID: 27644755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Wong CKH; Cheung PWH; Samartzis D; Luk KD; Cheung KMC; Lam CLK; Cheung JPY
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175847. PubMed ID: 28414745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is measured by the composite, single-item pain/discomfort dimension of the EQ-5D-5L? An exploratory analysis.
Engel L; Whitehurst DGT; Haagsma J; Janssen MF; Mulhern B
Qual Life Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):1175-1186. PubMed ID: 36469212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
