These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34236930)

  • 1. Diagnostic Accuracy of the AzBio Speech Recognition in Noise Test.
    Vermiglio AJ; Leclerc L; Thornton M; Osborne H; Bonilla E; Fang X
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3303-3316. PubMed ID: 34236930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Relationship between Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise for Young Adults with Pure-Tone Thresholds ≤ 25 dB HL.
    Vermiglio AJ; Osborne HR; Bonilla E; Leclerc L; Thornton M; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jul; 33(7-08):390-395. PubMed ID: 39074795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):206-222. PubMed ID: 29488871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances.
    Heeke P; Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Velappan K; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Cross-Language Comparison of Sentence Recognition Using American English and Mandarin Chinese HINT and AzBio Sentences.
    Xu L; Xi X; Patton A; Wang X; Qi B; Johnson L
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):405-413. PubMed ID: 32826510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The World Health Organization (WHO) hearing impairment guidelines and a speech recognition in noise (SRN) disorder.
    Vermiglio AJ; Fang X
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Oct; 61(10):818-825. PubMed ID: 34533433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Signal Type and Noise Background on Auditory Evoked Potential N1, P2, and P3 Measurements in Blast-Exposed Veterans.
    Papesh MA; Stefl AA; Gallun FJ; Billings CJ
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):106-121. PubMed ID: 32520849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A convergent validity study: Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences (LiSN-S) test and the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT).
    Vermiglio AJ; Bulla E; Skinner J; Heeke P; Fang X; Velappan K; Bonilla E; Garner E
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 32689850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spoken word recognition in noise in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Ren C; Yang J; Zha D; Lin Y; Liu H; Kong Y; Liu S; Xu L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():124-130. PubMed ID: 30173970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The MAndarin spoken word-Picture IDentification test in noise-Adaptive (MAPID-A) measures subtle speech-recognition-in-noise changes and spatial release from masking in very young children.
    Yuen KCP; Qiu XY; Mou HY; Xi X
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209768. PubMed ID: 30629627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking school age children with otitis media with effusion.
    Cai T; McPherson B; Li C; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183394. PubMed ID: 28829840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.