These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3423842)
1. The criminal justice/mental health system and the mentally retarded, mentally ill defendant. Williams W; Spruill J Soc Sci Med; 1987; 25(9):1027-32. PubMed ID: 3423842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts. Stafford KP; Wygant DB Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 15818634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mental health research in the criminal justice system: The need for common approaches and international perspectives. Roesch R; Ogloff JR; Eaves D Int J Law Psychiatry; 1995; 18(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7759184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cyclical path to recovery: Calling into question the wisdom of incarceration after restoration. Boutros A; Kang SS; Boutros NN Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():100-105. PubMed ID: 29548496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants. Shin H Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional protection of confessions made by mentally retarded defendants. Praiss DM Am J Law Med; 1989; 14(4):431-65. PubMed ID: 2729294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The differential impact of deinstitutionalization on white and nonwhite defendants found incompetent to stand trial. Arvanites TM Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 2790227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study. Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The question of involuntary treatment of nondangerous defendants who are found to be "incompetent to stand trial". Halpern AL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):213. PubMed ID: 15281427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A narrative review of international legislation regulating fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility: Is there a perfect system? Houidi A; Paruk S Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 74():101666. PubMed ID: 33418152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments. Perlin ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Homeless mentally disordered defendants: competency to stand trial and mental status findings. Martell DA; Rosner R; Harmon RB Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 7949417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of offenders with mental disorders: focusing on prison psychiatry]. Nakatani Y Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2011; 113(5):458-67. PubMed ID: 21706853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process. Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychiatric hospitalization of criminal defendants: new horizons. Reed FG; Fox RL Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 912121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court intervention to address the mental health needs of mentally ill offenders. Lamb HR; Weinberger LE; Reston-Parham C Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Mar; 47(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 8820551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases. Perlin ML Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting jail detention of defendants adjudicated incompetent to proceed. Christy A; Otto R; Finch J; Ringhoff D; Kimonis ER Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):707-16. PubMed ID: 20957691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]