331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3423842)
1. The criminal justice/mental health system and the mentally retarded, mentally ill defendant.
Williams W; Spruill J
Soc Sci Med; 1987; 25(9):1027-32. PubMed ID: 3423842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of competency to stand trial in mental health courts.
Stafford KP; Wygant DB
Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 15818634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mental health research in the criminal justice system: The need for common approaches and international perspectives.
Roesch R; Ogloff JR; Eaves D
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1995; 18(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7759184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cyclical path to recovery: Calling into question the wisdom of incarceration after restoration.
Boutros A; Kang SS; Boutros NN
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 57():100-105. PubMed ID: 29548496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the death of the death penalty near? The impact of Atkins and Roper on the future of capital punishment for mentally ill defendants.
Shin H
Fordham Law Rev; 2007 Oct; 76(1):465-516. PubMed ID: 17985486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Constitutional protection of confessions made by mentally retarded defendants.
Praiss DM
Am J Law Med; 1989; 14(4):431-65. PubMed ID: 2729294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The differential impact of deinstitutionalization on white and nonwhite defendants found incompetent to stand trial.
Arvanites TM
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 2790227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants' abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: a preliminary study.
Hoge SK; Poythress N; Bonnie R; Eisenberg M; Monahan J; Feucht-Haviar T; Oberlander L
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 8807159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The question of involuntary treatment of nondangerous defendants who are found to be "incompetent to stand trial".
Halpern AL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(2):213. PubMed ID: 15281427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A narrative review of international legislation regulating fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility: Is there a perfect system?
Houidi A; Paruk S
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 74():101666. PubMed ID: 33418152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court and the mentally disabled criminal defendant: recent developments.
Perlin ML
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1987; 15(4):391-409. PubMed ID: 3427241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Homeless mentally disordered defendants: competency to stand trial and mental status findings.
Martell DA; Rosner R; Harmon RB
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 7949417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Treatment of offenders with mental disorders: focusing on prison psychiatry].
Nakatani Y
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2011; 113(5):458-67. PubMed ID: 21706853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incompetent misdemeanants--pseudocivil commitment.
Rachlin S; Stokman CL; Grossman S
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 3697515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.
Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychiatric hospitalization of criminal defendants: new horizons.
Reed FG; Fox RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 912121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court intervention to address the mental health needs of mentally ill offenders.
Lamb HR; Weinberger LE; Reston-Parham C
Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Mar; 47(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 8820551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting jail detention of defendants adjudicated incompetent to proceed.
Christy A; Otto R; Finch J; Ringhoff D; Kimonis ER
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):707-16. PubMed ID: 20957691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
