These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34241113)

  • 1. Aircraft noise-Auralization-based assessment of weather-dependent effects on loudness and sharpness.
    Dreier C; Vorländer M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 May; 149(5):3565. PubMed ID: 34241113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving future low-noise aircraft technologies using experimental perception-based evaluation of synthetic flyovers.
    Pieren R; Bertsch L; Lauper D; Schäffer B
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 692():68-81. PubMed ID: 31336303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the potential limitations of conventional sound metrics in quantifying perception of nonlinearly propagated noise.
    Gee KL; Swift SH; Sparrow VW; Plotkin KJ; Downing JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):EL1-7. PubMed ID: 17297819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using A-weighting for psychoacoustic active noise control.
    Bao H; Panahi IM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5701-4. PubMed ID: 19963645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.
    Ellermeier W; Eigenstetter M; Zimmer K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 11325118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical ranges of loudness levels of various types of environmental noise, including traffic noise, aircraft noise, and industrial noise.
    Salomons EM; Janssen SA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1847-64. PubMed ID: 21776205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychoacoustic modelling of rotor noise.
    Torija AJ; Li Z; Chaitanya P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Mar; 151(3):1804. PubMed ID: 35364939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of noise levels and annoyance from aircraft run-ups at Vancouver International Airport.
    Scherebnyj K; Hodgson M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):1937-45. PubMed ID: 17902830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to noise in a community sample: II. Measurement of psychophysiological indices.
    Stansfeld SA; Clark CR; Turpin G; Jenkins LM; Tarnopolsky A
    Psychol Med; 1985 May; 15(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 4023130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise.
    Torija AJ; Nicholls RK
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Mar; 19(6):. PubMed ID: 35328839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of nonlinear effects in the propagation of noise from high-power jet aircraft.
    Gee KL; Sparrow VW; James MM; Downing JM; Hobbs CM; Gabrielson TB; Atchley AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4082-93. PubMed ID: 18537360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.