These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34241116)

  • 21. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility.
    Johnson EE; Dillon H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):441-59. PubMed ID: 21993050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of wearing face mask on speech intelligibility in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss and normal hearing sensitivity.
    Alkharabsheh A; Aboudi O; Abdulbaqi K; Garadat S
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Apr; 62(4):328-333. PubMed ID: 35235469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of nearby maskers on speech intelligibility in reverberant, multi-talker environments.
    Westermann A; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):2214. PubMed ID: 28372143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural model-based dynamic-range compression.
    Ernst SMA; Kortlang S; Grimm G; Bisitz T; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29373937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developing an Evidence-Based Military Auditory Fitness-for-Duty Standard Based on the 80-Word Modified Rhyme Test.
    Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Galloza H; Schurman JR; Russell S; Barrett ME; Witherell K; Makashay MJ; Heil T
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):209-222. PubMed ID: 36323655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatio-temporal Integration of Speech Reflections in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Rennies J; Warzybok A; Kollmeier B; Brand T
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221143901. PubMed ID: 36537084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Payton KL; Uchanski RM; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1581-92. PubMed ID: 8176061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identification of the Spectrotemporal Modulations That Support Speech Intelligibility in Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Venezia JH; Martin AG; Hickok G; Richards VM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1051-1067. PubMed ID: 30986140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Subjective vs. objective intelligibility of sentences in listeners with hearing loss.
    Cienkowski KM; Speaks C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 43(5):1205-10. PubMed ID: 11063241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN), list 3: a practice list.
    Wilson RH; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Feb; 23(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 22353677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Measuring the Influence of Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Response Times to an Arithmetic Task in Noise.
    Reinten I; De Ronde-Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler W
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014437. PubMed ID: 34027725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners.
    Noordhoek IM; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1685-96. PubMed ID: 10738821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An algorithm to increase intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in the presence of a competing talker.
    Healy EW; Delfarah M; Vasko JL; Carter BL; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4230. PubMed ID: 28618817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.